Hi,
Kicad ki...@iridec.com.au writes:
it's requested has been replaced with it's strongly encouraged.
You can find copies of the modified document here:
http://www.iridec.com.au/Kicad/KiCad_Tutorial_2011.pdf
http://www.iridec.com.au/Kicad/KiCad_Tutorial_2011.odt
Regards,
David
thanks for
Hello David,
thank you for your fast response!
You probably have heard of the Debian guidelines about free software
(DFSG), they try to define most clearly the frontier between free and
non-free software.
In real life, things are not either black or white: black and white are
united by a
Hi
it's requested has been replaced with it's strongly encouraged.
You can find copies of the modified document here:
http://www.iridec.com.au/Kicad/KiCad_Tutorial_2011.pdf
http://www.iridec.com.au/Kicad/KiCad_Tutorial_2011.odt
Regards,
David
On 16/06/2011 7:20 AM, Georges Khaznadar wrote:
Hello Timo, Berndt, David,
@Timo, Berndt:
thank you for raising this issue.
@David:
The bugreport raised by Timo and Berndt is available at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=630453
@everybody:
There are two solution for this issue:
- the license of the file
Hi,
Georges Khaznadar georges.khazna...@free.fr writes:
is it possible to have a single source package, giving two output packages
in different sections like main and non-free?
my idea is that it is not allowed,
this is not possible indeed since non-free stuff is not ok in the source
package
Hi,
thank you for your fast reply Timo. Let us wait some time for David's
response.
Best regards, Georges.
Timo Juhani Lindfors a écrit :
Hi,
Georges Khaznadar georges.khazna...@free.fr writes:
is it possible to have a single source package, giving two output packages
Hi,
I have deleted the offending line from the current version of the
document, which was updated this year. Does this resolve the issue?
You can find copies of the modified document here:
http://www.iridec.com.au/Kicad/KiCad_Tutorial_2011.pdf
7 matches
Mail list logo
