The libgl1-mesa-glx with Breaks: libgl1-nvidia-alternatives results in
problems for nvidia users:
Since packages like xorg, x11-utils, ... directly depend on
libgl1-mesa-glx | libgl1, users are forced to uninstall them as well
as higher level packages depending on them due to nvidia-glx.
For
Until fixed packages reach the archive, nvidia and fglrx users should
stick to mesa 7.10.2-3 packages, currently available in testing.
Sorry for the noise, just found what I've missed ;-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Hi Mario.
Mario Palomo mario...@gmail.com (17/06/2011):
[…]
So, I think that FGLRX needs a Breaks too.
I know. The question is which package and which version. I suspect
fglrx-glx(*), but no idea when a multiarch-aware version will be
released, and with which version number.
Adding uploaders
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 00:57:14 +0200, Mario Palomo wrote:
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (16/06/2011):
I'll try and get that done tomorrow, along with the CXXFLAGS patch we
received some days ago.
FGLRX folks, want a Breaks too? Now would be the time to request it. :)
I have FGLRX
Am 17.06.2011 09:41, schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
Hi Mario.
Mario Palomomario...@gmail.com (17/06/2011):
[…]
So, I think that FGLRX needs a Breaks too.
I know. The question is which package and which version. I suspect
fglrx-glx(*), but no idea when a multiarch-aware version will be
released,
Am 17.06.2011 09:43, schrieb Julien Cristau:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 00:57:14 +0200, Mario Palomo wrote:
Cyril Bruleboisk...@debian.org (16/06/2011):
I'll try and get that done tomorrow, along with the CXXFLAGS patch we
received some days ago.
FGLRX folks, want a Breaks too? Now would be
Patrick Matthäi pmatth...@debian.org (17/06/2011):
So it would be nice to give us some time :)
In which case that's going to be for the next revision. Please file your
own bug against src:mesa once you know what you need.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Patrick Matthäi pmatth...@debian.org (17/06/2011):
It should be 1:11-6-1 (where it will be fixed hopefuly)
Ah, giving you more time = 1 minute and 19 seconds? Fine. :D
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Patrick Matthäi pmatth...@debian.org (17/06/2011):
It should be 1:11-6-1 (where it will be fixed hopefuly)
Wild guess, we need a Breaks on: fglrx-glx ( 1:11-6-1)
from libgl1-mesa-glx, correct?
Not sure how your stuff works.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Am 17.06.2011 11:16, schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
Patrick Matthäipmatth...@debian.org (17/06/2011):
It should be 1:11-6-1 (where it will be fixed hopefuly)
Wild guess, we need a Breaks on: fglrx-glx ( 1:11-6-1)
from libgl1-mesa-glx, correct?
It is right, that fglrx-glx-ia32 is no longer
Am 17.06.2011 10:25, schrieb Patrick Matthäi:
Am 17.06.2011 09:41, schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
Hi Mario.
Mario Palomomario...@gmail.com (17/06/2011):
[…]
So, I think that FGLRX needs a Breaks too.
I know. The question is which package and which version. I suspect
fglrx-glx(*), but no idea
Package: libgl1-mesa-glx
Version: 7.10.2-4
Severity: normal
Hi KiBi,
could you add
Breaks: libgl1-nvidia-alternatives (= 275.09.07-1)
to libgl1-mesa-glx? (Best before the multiarch change moves to testing).
The multiarch move of MESA breaks current diversion handling (many
bugreports).
I'm
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Beckmann deb...@abeckmann.de (16/06/2011):
could you add
Breaks: libgl1-nvidia-alternatives (= 275.09.07-1)
to libgl1-mesa-glx? (Best before the multiarch change moves to testing).
I'll try and get that done tomorrow, along with the CXXFLAGS patch we
received some days
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (16/06/2011):
I'll try and get that done tomorrow, along with the CXXFLAGS patch we
received some days ago.
FGLRX folks, want a Breaks too? Now would be the time to request it. :)
I have FGLRX installed and composition work in KDE (¿software
emulated?), but
14 matches
Mail list logo
