Bug#631018: [RFC] libevent 2.0 transition

2011-09-07 Thread Romain Francoise
Hi, Any progress on this transition? Thanks, -- Romain Francoise http://people.debian.org/~rfrancoise/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#631018: [RFC] libevent 2.0 transition

2011-08-08 Thread Leo 'costela' Antunes
[please CC] Hi, On 19/06/11 16:30, Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote: > > I uploaded a new version of libevent to experimental which I'd like to > migrate to unstable as soon as possible. Since I'm the new guy helping > out with libevent and since this would be my first "bigish" transition, > I'd like

Bug#631018: [RFC] libevent 2.0 transition

2011-08-08 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 13:03:29 +0200, Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote: > I didn't get an explicit answer about this, so I thought I might ask > more directly: is it ok if I simply upload the new libevent to unstable? > No, it's not. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-r

Bug#631018: [RFC] libevent 2.0 transition

2011-08-08 Thread Leo 'costela' Antunes
On 08/08/11 22:05, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 13:03:29 +0200, Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote: > >> I didn't get an explicit answer about this, so I thought I might ask >> more directly: is it ok if I simply upload the new libevent to unstable? >> > No, it's not. Ok, fair enough.

Bug#631018: [RFC] libevent 2.0 transition

2011-08-09 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 01:01:53 +0200, Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote: > On 08/08/11 22:05, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 13:03:29 +0200, Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote: > > > >> I didn't get an explicit answer about this, so I thought I might ask > >> more directly: is it ok if I

Bug#631018: [RFC] libevent 2.0 transition

2011-11-21 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 16:30:19 +0200, Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote: > I uploaded a new version of libevent to experimental which I'd like to > migrate to unstable as soon as possible. Since I'm the new guy helping > out with libevent and since this would be my first "bigish" transition, > I'd lik

Bug#631018: [RFC] libevent 2.0 transition

2011-12-07 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 18:32:53 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 10:15:41 +1100, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > > > I'll upload 2.0.x to upstable soon. > > Rebuilds of dependent packages have been scheduled, with these missing > bits: > - chromium-browser: needs a fix fo

Bug#631018: [RFC] libevent 2.0 transition

2011-12-07 Thread Sam Hartman
Well, I've taken a bit of a look at python-event. Unfortunately, it looks like it simply doesn't support libevent2. It seems to dig into the bufferevent structs a lot in ways that have changed between libevent 1.x and 2.x. There was a release this year after a several year gap, but as far as I c

Bug#631018: [RFC] libevent 2.0 transition

2011-12-07 Thread Leo 'costela' Antunes
Hi, On 07/12/11 19:02, Julien Cristau wrote: >> - getstream: #622278 >> - honeyd: #632765 >> - ladvd: #650670 >> - python-event: #632763 >> - transmission: #650812 I'm also the maintainer here, but the version currently in experimental is blocked by a build-dep on libminiupnpc-dev (>= 1.6) (which

Bug#631018: [RFC] libevent 2.0 transition

2011-12-17 Thread Julien Cristau
Quick update on the libevent2 transition: On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 18:32:53 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 10:15:41 +1100, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > > > I'll upload 2.0.x to upstable soon. > > Rebuilds of dependent packages have been scheduled, with these missing >

Bug#631018: [RFC] libevent 2.0 transition

2011-12-17 Thread Leo 'costela' Antunes
On 17/12/11 12:14, Julien Cristau wrote: >> - transmission: #650812 > > That bug is fixed, but migration is still blocked by #642538. Sorry, this is actually fixed in the package, but I left the bug open because I wanted to find a proper fix for upstream (the debian patch turned out to be a bad s

Bug#631018: [RFC] libevent 2.0 transition

2011-11-24 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 00:22:57 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 16:30:19 +0200, Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote: > > > I uploaded a new version of libevent to experimental which I'd like to > > migrate to unstable as soon as possible. Since I'm the new guy helping > > out with

Bug#631018: [RFC] libevent 2.0 transition

2011-11-24 Thread Anibal Monsalve Salazar
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 11:56:16PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 00:22:57 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 16:30:19 +0200, Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote: > > > > > I uploaded a new version of libevent to experimental which I'd like to > > > migrate to

Bug#631018: [RFC] libevent 2.0 transition

2011-12-03 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 10:15:41 +1100, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > I'll upload 2.0.x to upstable soon. Rebuilds of dependent packages have been scheduled, with these missing bits: - chromium-browser: needs a fix for #647992 - getstream: #622278 - honeyd: #632765 - ladvd: #650670 - python-ev

Bug#631018: [RFC] libevent 2.0 transition

2011-09-23 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 08/09/2011 01:01 AM, Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote: > > So is there anything I can do to help get things going? (assuming I > *could* help) It would help to fix (at least) memcached (current RC bugs, and wrt libevent 2.0) before starting the transition. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي htt

Bug#631018: [RFC] libevent 2.0 transition

2011-06-19 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition On 06/19/2011 04:30 PM, Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote: [please CC] Please subscribe to this (being filed) bugreport. Hi, I uploaded a new version of libevent to experimental which I