Bug#632949: libjpeg6b: libjpeg-turbo

2011-09-20 Thread Bill Allombert
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 09:33:37PM +0300, Fathi Boudra wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Bill Allombert wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 06:05:52PM +0300, Fathi Boudra wrote: > >> Hi Bill, > >> > >> For information, we have an ITP running: http://bugs.debian.org/612341 > >> > >> > libjpeg

Bug#632949: libjpeg6b: libjpeg-turbo

2011-09-20 Thread Fathi Boudra
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 06:05:52PM +0300, Fathi Boudra wrote: >> Hi Bill, >> >> For information, we have an ITP running: http://bugs.debian.org/612341 >> >> > libjpeg-turbo only support the old libjpeg62 interface and not the new >> > libjpe

Bug#632949: libjpeg6b: libjpeg-turbo

2011-09-20 Thread Bill Allombert
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 06:05:52PM +0300, Fathi Boudra wrote: > Hi Bill, > > For information, we have an ITP running: http://bugs.debian.org/612341 > > > libjpeg-turbo only support the old libjpeg62 interface and not the new > > libjpeg8 one, > > which support more image format, and provide high

Bug#632949: libjpeg6b: libjpeg-turbo

2011-09-20 Thread Fathi Boudra
Hi Bill, For information, we have an ITP running: http://bugs.debian.org/612341 > libjpeg-turbo only support the old libjpeg62 interface and not the new > libjpeg8 one, > which support more image format, and provide higher image quality. libjpeg-turbo supports v7 or v8 emulation. > Unfortunate

Bug#632949: libjpeg6b: libjpeg-turbo

2011-07-11 Thread Bill Allombert
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 11:01:28AM +0100, David Morgado wrote: > > I am not sure how many bug report you are planning to report, > Just the one. Which one ? Maybe you did not notice but you reported both #632869 and #632949. > > but we are moving to libjpeg8, > Fair enough > > > libjpeg-turbo i

Bug#632949: libjpeg6b: libjpeg-turbo

2011-07-08 Thread David Morgado
> I am not sure how many bug report you are planning to report, Just the one. > but we are moving to libjpeg8, Fair enough > libjpeg-turbo is a technological dead-end. Could you elaborate on that? Just curious. Thanks David On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Thu, Jul

Bug#632949: libjpeg6b: libjpeg-turbo

2011-07-07 Thread Bill Allombert
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 11:33:22AM +0100, David Morgado wrote: > Package: libjpeg6b > Severity: wishlist > > Hello, could you please provide libjpeg-turbo. It is much faster than > libjpeg on x86 and x64 arch at least. > > http://libjpeg-turbo.virtualgl.org/ > http://sourceforge.net/projects/

Bug#632949: libjpeg6b: libjpeg-turbo

2011-07-07 Thread David Morgado
Package: libjpeg6b Severity: wishlist Hello, could you please provide libjpeg-turbo. It is much faster than libjpeg on x86 and x64 arch at least. http://libjpeg-turbo.virtualgl.org/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/libjpeg-turbo/ On Fedora it has replaced libjpeg. http://fedoraproject.org/