On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 02:41:39PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>I would be quite happy for you to do the NMU if you've tested the
>result. Anibal, Luk, any objection to that?
I'm planning to work on the nfs-utils /run transition after I finish the
same transition for rpcbind.
signature.asc
Desc
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 08:10:57PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> > Correctly migrates and is correctly recreated on service restart.
> > Looks OK here.
> >
> > Note: I tested by applying the patch to current unstable nfs-utils;
> > I couldn't build from git directly for some reason. It's not this
> >
On 12/07/2011 04:14 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 02:55:55PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 02:41:39PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 09:52 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
tags 633034 + patch
thanks
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 a
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 02:55:55PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 02:41:39PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 09:52 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > > tags 633034 + patch
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 11:33:01PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 02:41:39PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 09:52 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > tags 633034 + patch
> > thanks
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 11:33:01PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > > Source: nfs-utils
> > > Version: 1:1.2.3-3
> > > Severity: important
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 09:52 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> tags 633034 + patch
> thanks
>
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 11:33:01PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > Source: nfs-utils
> > Version: 1:1.2.3-3
> > Severity: important
> >
> > Your package is currently using/lib/init/rw/sendsigs.omit.d
> > which
tags 633034 + patch
thanks
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 11:33:01PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Source: nfs-utils
> Version: 1:1.2.3-3
> Severity: important
>
> Your package is currently using/lib/init/rw/sendsigs.omit.d
> which is now deprecated and pending removal. Please update your
> package to us
On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 09:10:24PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 10:25:24 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
> > /lib/init/rw will be removed in the next week or so.
>
> What, why?
This was I think mentioned in the original report, in the
link to the /run transition document at
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 10:25:24 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> /lib/init/rw will be removed in the next week or so.
What, why?
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 11:33:01PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Source: nfs-utils
> Version: 1:1.2.3-3
> Severity: important
>
> Your package is currently using/lib/init/rw/sendsigs.omit.d
> which is now deprecated and pending removal. Please update your
> package to use /run/sendsigs.omit.d with
Source: nfs-utils
Version: 1:1.2.3-3
Severity: important
Your package is currently using/lib/init/rw/sendsigs.omit.d
which is now deprecated and pending removal. Please update your
package to use /run/sendsigs.omit.d with a versioned dependency
on initscripts, as detailed below.
An overview of t
11 matches
Mail list logo
