On Sat, 16 Jul 2011, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
OK, patch attached.
Thanks!
That fixes most regressions I could produce in above patch. There is one
left when --force is used, I'm not sure if I did this correctly or I
found another bug.
In fact set_choice() did not support passing
On 2011-07-16 09:01, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
+ok(-f $bindir/slave2, forced switching w/o slave keeps real files
installed as slave links);
This test was reversed, with --force it must remove the file.
Probably depends on your interpretation of --force.
I would leave real files in the place
On Sat, 16 Jul 2011, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
This test was reversed, with --force it must remove the file.
Probably depends on your interpretation of --force.
To avoid any ambiguity I updated the manual page to indicate that --force
also allows the removal of files which are in place where
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
The following script demonstrates the problem:
Thank you for your report and your test script. Do you think you could
update the non-regression test-suite of update-alternatives to reproduce
the problem?
This is much more useful than just a test
tag 633627 + patch
thanks
On Fri, 15 Jul 2011, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
In the mean time, I will look into fixing this regression.
Here's a patch, can you tell me if it works for you?
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer
Follow my Debian News ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.com (English)
On 2011-07-15 21:32, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Thank you for your report and your test script. Do you think you could
update the non-regression test-suite of update-alternatives to
reproduce the problem?
OK, patch attached.
On 2011-07-15 22:08, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
tag 633627 + patch
thanks
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.15.8.11
Severity: important
File: /usr/bin/update-alternatives
Tags: sid squeeze
Hi,
update-alternatives happily removes regular files that are in place of
alternative slave links if the currently selected alternative does not
have that particular slave. This is a
7 matches
Mail list logo
