On dim., 2011-07-17 at 16:46 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
2011/7/17 Lionel Le Folgoc mrpo...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Thanks for the patch. But the issue isn't that it builds fine, rather to
be sure that it works. I think I remember this was the reason why we
didn't add it a few months ago.
Thanks for the patch. But the issue isn't that it builds fine, rather to
be sure that it works. I think I remember this was the reason why we
didn't add it a few months ago.
Could you by chance test the package on kfreebsd-amd64?
Actually, I can't. I'm CCing debian-bsd. If someone who reads
On mer., 2011-07-20 at 11:42 +0200, Petr Salinger wrote:
Thanks for the patch. But the issue isn't that it builds fine, rather to
be sure that it works. I think I remember this was the reason why we
didn't add it a few months ago.
Could you by chance test the package on kfreebsd-amd64?
2011/7/20 Yves-Alexis Perez cor...@debian.org:
So that mean we can use kfreebsd-i386 kfreebsd-amd64 but not
kfreebsd-any since mipsel won't have it, right?
Right.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 11:58:50AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
Package: xfce4-battery-plugin
Version: 1.0.0-2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
This package builds fine on kfreebsd-amd64, and presumably it will build fine
on future
2011/7/17 Lionel Le Folgoc mrpo...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Thanks for the patch. But the issue isn't that it builds fine, rather to
be sure that it works. I think I remember this was the reason why we
didn't add it a few months ago.
Could you by chance test the package on kfreebsd-amd64?
Actually,
Package: xfce4-battery-plugin
Version: 1.0.0-2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
This package builds fine on kfreebsd-amd64, and presumably it will build fine
on future kfreebsd-* architectures (like the upcoming kfreebsd-mipsel).
Please consider
7 matches
Mail list logo
