Hi,
Is 634829 also relevant in our default configuration? (Whether or not it is I
think the fix should be pushed to squeeze. But if it is we probably want to
include the fix in beta1.)
cheers,
Holger
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
[Holger Levsen]
Hi,
Is 634829 also relevant in our default configuration? (Whether or
not it is I think the fix should be pushed to squeeze. But if it is
we probably want to include the fix in beta1.)
I did not test, so I do not know. I do not have a test bed ready, and
no spare time to
Hi Petter,
the script fails at the very first Popen call. If I replace
proc = subprocess.Popen(cmd, shell-True, stdout=subprocess.PIPE,)
with
proc = subprocess.Popen(cmd, shell-True, stdout=None,)
the call succeeds. If the user has a local account, login succeeds, too.
I haven't tested any
Could this be connected to a known (and fixed) race condition in python?
See here: http://bugs.python.org/issue1731717
On 25/07/11 18:00, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Wolfgang Schulze-Zachau]
Hi Petter,
nope, doesn't make any difference, I still get the Unexpected
exception, should never
[Wolfgang Schulze-Zachau]
Hi Petter,
the script fails at the very first Popen call. If I replace
proc = subprocess.Popen(cmd, shell-True, stdout=subprocess.PIPE,)
with
proc = subprocess.Popen(cmd, shell-True, stdout=None,)
the call succeeds. If the user has a local account, login
On 26/07/11 11:30, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
It was written like that because I am not very familiar with Python
and found a example doing it like that.
To be honest, I am not particularly good friends with python, either.
Would it be unfair to say we should take the route of least
[Wolfgang Schulze-Zachau]
Would it be unfair to say we should take the route of least
resistance?
I have no problem with your proposed change, so why not. Can you test
the new version currently available from
svn://svn.debian.org/svn/debian-edu/trunk/src/libpam-mklocaluser
?
If it works
Attached is a modified version of the python script which works for me.
Essentially I have added some poll() calls to ensure the shell commands
are completed before communicating with the subprocesses.
I have also added two lines in the runcmd subroutine to log any error
messages to syslog. Hope
[Wolfgang Schulze-Zachau]
Attached is a modified version of the python script which works for
me. Essentially I have added some poll() calls to ensure the shell
commands are completed before communicating with the subprocesses.
Right. Make sense.
I have also added two lines in the runcmd
[Wolfgang Schulze-Zachau]
Hi Petter,
nope, doesn't make any difference, I still get the Unexpected
exception, should never happen ... message.
Hm. Not quite sure how to figure out what is missing a child. Could
you try to add log/print statements to try to figure out what is
failing?
I
Hi Petter,
nope, doesn't make any difference, I still get the Unexpected
exception, should never happen ... message. I have stopped nscd, no
difference. And nslcd isn't installed (do I need it other than for
caching?).
Puzzled...
On 23/07/11 10:42, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Wolfgang
[Wolfgang Schulze-Zachau]
Jul 20 11:22:49 it-50 pam_mklocaluser[1765]: Unexpected exception, should
never happen: [Errno 10] No child processes
This is the key error report. Not quite sure which child process is
the problem. Hm, is nscd installed? Perhaps the problem is the call
Package: libpam-mklocaluser
Version: 0.6
Severity: important
I am using sssd to authenticate against a Microsoft AD server. The pam
configuration
was created using pam-auth-update, i.e. it is completely system generated.
When authenticating at the initial gdm login prompt, the login fails, and
13 matches
Mail list logo
