Paul Millar wrote:
>
> If possible, could you reassign this ticket?
>
>
Reassigned to virtualbox, after a small false start where it got
accidentally closed.
Cheers,
Simon.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
Hi Simon,
On Wednesday 31 August 2011 22:46:24 Simon Kelley wrote:
> I'm not aware of this bug having been manifest anywhere except here and
> I can't progress it without further information from the submitter.
> Since the package is working fine for almost everyone, I'm downgrading
> this to "nor
I'm not aware of this bug having been manifest anywhere except here and
I can't progress it without further information from the submitter.
Since the package is working fine for almost everyone, I'm downgrading
this to "normal". It's certainly not release critical.
Cheers,
Simon.
--
To UNSUB
Paul Millar wrote:
> As a shot-in-the-dark, I've checked for dnsmasq reply packets on the other
> interfaces (lo, eth0, br1). There's no sign of the reply packets.
>
> This used to work, so it looks like a bug introduced with a recent upgrade of
> the dnsmasq package.
>
There have been no rece
Package: dnsmasq
Version: 2.57-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I am using dnsmasq to answer DHCP requests from virtual machines as they power
up. The requests are sent over an (internal) bridge (called "br0") on the host
machine.
When watching the incoming packets on th
5 matches
Mail list logo
