Le 27/07/2017 à 11:37, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
> If so, it would have been helpful if the bug report showed that.
You could have inquired politely about the state of package too.
> That's not how Debian works, sorry.
Blaming maintainers is certainly not how Debian works.
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 09:42:33PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 26/07/2017 à 21:10, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
>
> > this is getting ridiculous.
>
> Do you realize that there is an ongoing effort to upgrade pdfsam
If so, it would have been helpful if the bug report showed that.
> and that
Le 26/07/2017 à 21:10, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
> this is getting ridiculous.
Do you realize that there is an ongoing effort to upgrade pdfsam and
that this kind of comment is rather demotivating? If you don't help you
are not allowed to complain.
Emmanuel Bourg
Am 26.07.2017 um 21:10 schrieb Wouter Verhelst:
> Package: pdfsam
> Version: 1.1.4-4
> Followup-For: Bug #635964
>
> Newest version of pdfsam on pdfsam.org is now v3.3.2 (see
> https://github.com/torakiki/pdfsam/releases for the list of known
> releases).
>
> This version of pdfsam is now 7
Package: pdfsam
Version: 1.1.4-4
Followup-For: Bug #635964
Newest version of pdfsam on pdfsam.org is now v3.3.2 (see
https://github.com/torakiki/pdfsam/releases for the list of known
releases).
This version of pdfsam is now 7 years out of date. It should either be
updated, or removed from the
5 matches
Mail list logo