Bug#637082: #637082

2011-11-20 Thread Michael Tokarev
On 01.11.2011 21:24, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/11/1 Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru: But whole approach - trying to canonicalize the path this way - is most likely wrong. It shouldn't be needed for the kernel since it will do path resolution internally anyway during mount. And it breaks

Bug#637082: #637082

2011-11-20 Thread Robert Millan
2011/11/20 Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru: (FYI, FreeBSD mount canonicalizes, but it might be gratuitous there too) I don't see where it does that.  It canonicalizes the target directory argument, that's for sure, but not the spec argument.  See

Bug#637082: #637082

2011-11-01 Thread Michael Tokarev
[Cc'ing #637082 - hope you dont mind...] On 01.11.2011 19:52, Robert Millan wrote: Hi Michael, Btw, with all this mess it seems you forgot about my patch in #637082. If everything is okay with it, would be cool if it can be included with next upload. No I didn't really forgot about it.

Bug#637082: #637082

2011-11-01 Thread Robert Millan
2011/11/1 Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru: But whole approach - trying to canonicalize the path this way - is most likely wrong.  It shouldn't be needed for the kernel since it will do path resolution internally anyway during mount.  And it breaks various pseudo filesystems, incl. tmpfs,