On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 01:30:50PM +, Philip Hands wrote:
> I just upgraded a wheezy box, and was again asked if I wanted to keep
> my local FSCKFIX=yes option, or return to the (stupid) default.
>
> That made me scratch my head, thinking: wasn't there a bug about that?
Yes. The reason for
Package: initscripts
Version: 2.88dsf-41
Followup-For: Bug #637087
Hi,
I just upgraded a wheezy box, and was again asked if I wanted to keep
my local FSCKFIX=yes option, or return to the (stupid) default.
That made me scratch my head, thinking: wasn't there a bug about that?
The bug is against
Roger Leigh writes:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 09:13:35AM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
>> Having upgraded to wheezy recently, I note that you're changing defaults
>> in rcS (as exhaustively discussed elsewhere).
>>
>> That being the case, there is no additional cost to fixing this bug,
>> as people
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 02:27:40PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> Roger Leigh writes:
> > On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 09:13:35AM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> >> The only disadvantage I can think of with FSCKFIX=yes is the reduced
> >> likelihood of noticing (if you happen to understand the messages) to
Hi Roger,
Thanks for the lightning-quick response :-)
Roger Leigh writes:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 09:13:35AM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
>> Having upgraded to wheezy recently, I note that you're changing defaults
>> in rcS (as exhaustively discussed elsewhere).
>>
>> That being the case, there
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 09:13:35AM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> Having upgraded to wheezy recently, I note that you're changing defaults
> in rcS (as exhaustively discussed elsewhere).
>
> That being the case, there is no additional cost to fixing this bug,
> as people are going to be prompted on
Package: initscripts
Version: 2.88dsf-22.1
Followup-For: Bug #637087
Having upgraded to wheezy recently, I note that you're changing defaults
in rcS (as exhaustively discussed elsewhere).
That being the case, there is no additional cost to fixing this bug,
as people are going to be prompted on up
On 08/08/2011 02:49 PM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> I also suggested that it was better if the setting was adjusted at
> install time based on the machine being installed on (for example only
> for laptops or if the desktop task were installed), as changing the
> default might be risky in some set
[Daniel Baumann]
> In the 'Could we make desktop users need their local Debian geeks
> less' bof at debconf11 a few days ago, where Petter was present as
> well, it was suggested to set FSCKFIX=yes by default. Please do so
> :)
I also suggested that it was better if the setting was adjusted at
ins
Package: sysvinit
Severity: wishlist
In the 'Could we make desktop users need their local Debian geeks less'
bof at debconf11 a few days ago, where Petter was present as well, it
was suggested to set FSCKFIX=yes by default. Please do so :)
Regards,
Daniel
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donn
10 matches
Mail list logo
