tag 637114 + pending
thanks
On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 21:20 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> 2011/9/18 Adam D. Barratt :
> > On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 12:55 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> >> kfreebsd-9_ada_devices.patch and zfs_packed_la_array.patch have been
> >> tested for over a month (both in unstable/whe
2011/9/18 Adam D. Barratt :
> On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 12:55 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>> kfreebsd-9_ada_devices.patch and zfs_packed_la_array.patch have been
>> tested for over a month (both in unstable/wheezy and my squeeze
>> desktop with ZFS).
>>
>> raid_number_uniqueness.patch and xen_disk_name
tag 637114 + confirmed
thanks
On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 12:55 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> 2011/9/17 Adam D. Barratt :
> > How much testing have the proposed patches had on Squeeze systems?
>
> kfreebsd-9_ada_devices.patch and zfs_packed_la_array.patch have been
> tested for over a month (both in un
2011/9/17 Adam D. Barratt :
> How much testing have the proposed patches had on Squeeze systems?
kfreebsd-9_ada_devices.patch and zfs_packed_la_array.patch have been
tested for over a month (both in unstable/wheezy and my squeeze
desktop with ZFS).
raid_number_uniqueness.patch and xen_disk_names.
On Sat, 2011-08-27 at 12:00 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> 2011/8/27 Jonathan Nieder :
> >> #601974 is indeed fixed in unstable, it wasn't closed in changelog
> >> because the fix was applied directly to upstream (and included with
> >> 1.99-1 upload). I've closed that bug and put everyone involved
2011/8/27 Jonathan Nieder :
>> #601974 is indeed fixed in unstable, it wasn't closed in changelog
>> because the fix was applied directly to upstream (and included with
>> 1.99-1 upload). I've closed that bug and put everyone involved on CC.
>>
>> #610184 might not be fixed in unstable according t
reopen 610184
quit
Hi,
Robert Millan wrote:
> I had a look at those two bugs:
>
> #601974 is indeed fixed in unstable, it wasn't closed in changelog
> because the fix was applied directly to upstream (and included with
> 1.99-1 upload). I've closed that bug and put everyone involved on CC.
>
>
2011/8/8 Adam D. Barratt :
> I assume via X-Debbugs-Cc?
Yes.
2011/8/8 Colin Watson :
> The short thread starting at
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2011/06/msg00154.html may be
> helpful. I'm afraid I haven't had time to work through Adam's concern;
> do you think you might have time to
On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 16:47:03 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 15:06:12 +, Robert Millan wrote:
* Mark la_array as packed.
- zfs_packed_la_array.patch
This fixes boot breakage under certain conditions, more details in:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-grub/2011-07
On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 03:06:12PM +, Robert Millan wrote:
> Please consider:
>
> > [ Colin Watson ]
> > * Backport from upstream:
> >- Handle Xen split-partition disk image devices (closes: 601974).
> >- Check RAID superblock offset (closes: #610184).
> >- Ensure uniqueness of R
On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 15:06:12 +, Robert Millan wrote:
[ Colin Watson ]
* Backport from upstream:
- Handle Xen split-partition disk image devices (closes: 601974).
- Check RAID superblock offset (closes: #610184).
- Ensure uniqueness of RAID array numbers even if some elements
have
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Please consider:
> [ Colin Watson ]
> * Backport from upstream:
>- Handle Xen split-partition disk image devices (closes: 601974).
>- Check RAID superblock offset (closes: #610184).
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
