reassign 637231 hurd
thanks
Daniel Kahn Gillmor, le Thu 11 Aug 2011 23:07:22 -0400, a écrit :
0) I see a number of other /dev/random options at:
https://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/hurd/translator/random.html
Have they all been explored and rejected for some reason or another?
I thought
Niko Tyni, le Wed 10 Aug 2011 09:39:44 +0300, a écrit :
As discussed in the policy (section 3.8, Essential packages), adding
functionality to the Essential set is not something to do lightly.
Sure.
We are preparing to upload from debian-ports to Debian main a simple
Hurd translator,
Samuel Thibault, le Thu 11 Aug 2011 17:50:35 +0200, a écrit :
That said, it's not only about being essential, but also package
priority, perl is not required.
I see /usr/bin/sha1sum is already in the Essential set. Would it
be viable to fork that and compute the SHA checksums through a
On 08/11/2011 09:06 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Samuel Thibault, le Thu 11 Aug 2011 17:50:35 +0200, a écrit :
That said, it's not only about being essential, but also package
priority, perl is not required.
I see /usr/bin/sha1sum is already in the Essential set. Would it
be viable to fork
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 12:24:02AM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
The short story is: we, Debian Hurd packagers, would like to see
Digest::SHA moved from perl to perl-base.
As discussed in the policy (section 3.8, Essential packages), adding
functionality to the Essential set is not something to
Package: perl-base
Severity: wishlist
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 12:31:43AM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 00:24:02 +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
Hi Perl people,
Hi Hurd guys :)
The short story is: we, Debian Hurd packagers, would like to see
Digest::SHA moved from
6 matches
Mail list logo
