Bug#637360: backtrace() doesn't work on armel

2011-08-11 Thread Aurelien Jarno
# Restoring original tags and severity severity 637360 normal tag 637360 - upstream tag 637360 - wontfix thanks On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 06:15:59PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: severity 637360 wishlist retitle 637360 [arm] backtrace() requires unwind information # unlikely to be fixed any

Bug#637360: backtrace() doesn't work on armel

2011-08-11 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Aurelien Jarno wrote: Backtrace code for ARM EABI has been added in glibc 2.11 [1], and is based on unwind information. -funwind-tables is therefore necessary to get it working, and then backtrace() is fully functional. I therefore don't see the need to tag this bug as wontfix. Sure, I

Bug#637360: backtrace() doesn't work on armel

2011-08-10 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: libc6 Version: 2.13-15 Severity: normal Hello, The test suite of ocaml-extunix 0.0.3-1 fails on armel because the following program: #include execinfo.h int main() { void *buffer[100]; return backtrace(buffer, 100); } returns 0. It returns with a non-zero status (3

Bug#637360: backtrace() doesn't work on armel

2011-08-10 Thread Jonathan Nieder
severity 637360 wishlist retitle 637360 [arm] backtrace() requires unwind information # unlikely to be fixed any time soon tags 637360 + upstream wontfix quit Hi Stéphane, Stéphane Glondu wrote: #include execinfo.h int main() { void *buffer[100]; return backtrace(buffer, 100);