Don,
recently you tagged bug 63995 "bugs.debian.org reveals e-mail addresses
to spammers" with a comment saying "YEAY STUPID DON'T SHOW MY EMAIL
MEME!".
As I don't think that comment really deals with the solutions suggested
in the bug report, I'd appre
Why did you "wontfix" bug 63995?
Because it won't be fixed.
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Johan Walles wrote:
> recently you tagged bug 63995 "bugs.debian.org reveals e-mail
> addresses to spammers" with a comment saying "YEAY STUPID DON'T SHOW
> MY EMAIL MEME
Hello. I'm just a regular Debian user, but please reconsider doing
something about the distribution of bug reporters' email addresses,
at least through the web interface.
It has gotten so bad that the turnaround between reporting a bug through
'reportbug' with a brand new email-address and receivi
Hello,
it makes me smile to read the first requests, dated back in the good old times
when people found it disturbing to receive 1 spam/day (and bug numbers still
fitted 5 digits...).
My company's spam-killer has moved to /dev/null as many as 4512 messages to my
address since Jan 8 2007, i.e.
[bcc to all contributors to #63995]
also sprach Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.08.24.1024 +0200]:
> The solution (namely, turning @ into @ is
> a needless obfuscation that isn't going to actually net us anything.
I agree with this (even though the approach works for me beautifully).
I'v
Package: bugs.debian.org
Followup-For: Bug #63995
Hi,
many people have reported this to be an issue for them. Quite a few of
them quit writing bug reports. I really do not understand why the
maintainers of bdo blatantly ignore this problem when solutions have
been put forward that do not
uscated in any case).
This way spam can be kept under some acceptable values...
Please reconsider implementing this feature.
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=35;bug=63995
--
Regards,
EddyP
=
"Imagination is more important
7 matches
Mail list logo
