2011/9/12 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer perezme...@gmail.com:
On Dom 11 Sep 2011 06:00:39 Mathieu Malaterre escribió:
[snip]
Now ParaViewConfig.cmake should be installed by paraview-dev. To help the
transition, all the packages that currently build-depend on paraview
should be filled
On Mar 13 Sep 2011 04:06:12 Mathieu Malaterre escribió:
[snip]
Just FYI. *.cmake files have been moved to paraview-dev, if you take
the latest from git.
What is left to do is:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-science/packages/paraview.git;a=
On Dom 11 Sep 2011 06:00:39 Mathieu Malaterre escribió:
[snip]
Now ParaViewConfig.cmake should be installed by paraview-dev. To help the
transition, all the packages that currently build-depend on paraview
should be filled a normal bug, raised to important in ~3 or 4 weeks and
then to
Lisandro,
2011/9/11 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer perezme...@gmail.com:
On Sáb 10 Sep 2011 17:32:30 Anton Gladky escribió:
I propose to remove paraview-dev at all and include all files into the
paraview-binary, like it was in previous versions of paraview.
That sounds like a very bad
severity 640195 normal
thanks
No reasons for this bug to be a serious [1] and not to let
testing-users to get 3.10-version soon.
Please, discuss on the list before changing the severity.
[1] http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities
Anton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
I propose to remove paraview-dev at all and include all files into the
paraview-binary, like it was in previous versions of paraview.
Anton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sáb 10 Sep 2011 17:32:30 Anton Gladky escribió:
I propose to remove paraview-dev at all and include all files into the
paraview-binary, like it was in previous versions of paraview.
That sounds like a very bad decision. Header files should be provided by the
-dev package.
This allows a
Bug #640195 [paraview] paraview-dev transition
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
I am not agree with that. Why is that bug serious?
It does not break anything. I would keep it normal.
Anton
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Debian Bug Tracking System
ow...@bugs.debian.org wrote
Anton,
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Anton Gladky gladky.an...@gmail.com wrote:
thanks for fixing that bug! But I have a couple of notice:
You have commented those 2 lines:
#CFLAGS := -Wall -lXt $(shell dpkg-buildflags --get CFLAGS)
#CXXFLAGS := -Wall -lXt $(shell dpkg-buildflags --get
tag 640195 pending
thanks
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org wrote:
Le dimanche 04 septembre 2011 à 12:00 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Anton Gladky gladky.an...@gmail.com wrote:
Before I close this bug, could you
Hi Mathieu,
thanks for fixing that bug! But I have a couple of notice:
You have commented those 2 lines:
#CFLAGS := -Wall -lXt $(shell dpkg-buildflags --get CFLAGS)
#CXXFLAGS := -Wall -lXt $(shell dpkg-buildflags --get CXXFLAGS)
I would keep them, as was suggested by Bernhard R. Link [1]
retitle 640195 paraview-dev transition
thanks
Ok let's use this bug number to track the transition for the paraview
package. the first vtkedge bug report when building vtkedge paraview
module has arrived.
--
Mathieu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Anton Gladky gladky.an...@gmail.com wrote:
Before I close this bug, could you please confirm this is done on
purpose ? My intial understanding when you volonteer to help on the
paraview package, was that paraview package should only contains
anything needed by
Le dimanche 04 septembre 2011 à 12:00 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Anton Gladky gladky.an...@gmail.com wrote:
Before I close this bug, could you please confirm this is done on
purpose ? My intial understanding when you volonteer to help on the
Package: paraview
Version: 3.10.1-4
Severity: important
Since the move to paraview 3.10, the cmake import file:
/usr/lib/paraview/ParaViewConfig.cmake
has now disapeared. This makes it impossible for 3rd party software to compile
paraview module.
Thanks for preserving the previous behavior !
Hi Mathieu,
the file is in paraview-package itself as
/usr/lib/paraview/ParaViewConfig.cmake [1]
[1] http://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/paraview/filelist
Anton
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Mathieu Malaterre
mathieu.malate...@gmail.com wrote:
Package: paraview
Version: 3.10.1-4
Anton,
Thanks for the quick answer ! Sorry I missed this hit using a
packages.d.o query for ParaViewConfig.cmake.
Before I close this bug, could you please confirm this is done on
purpose ? My intial understanding when you volonteer to help on the
paraview package, was that paraview package
Before I close this bug, could you please confirm this is done on
purpose ? My intial understanding when you volonteer to help on the
paraview package, was that paraview package should only contains
anything needed by paraview application at run time. While
paraview-dev would be a package
18 matches
Mail list logo
