Bug#640499: libxvmc: please add multiarch support

2013-05-29 Thread Laurent Bigonville
Package: libxvmc Followup-For: Bug #640499 Dear maintainers, Now that the wheezy has been released, could you please consider applying the patch(es) provided in the bug. Or if you don't have the time, do you want me to have a loot at this? Kind regards Laurent Bigonville -- System Information

Bug#640499: libxvmc: please add multiarch support

2013-03-04 Thread Chris Wadge
Once i386 libraries are installed, I've found that NVidia's own installation scripts do an adequate job of providing the necessary 32-bit GL libraries. This enables the expected 3D behavior one would expect from 32-bit WINE installations, including via PlayOnLinux. Not to say that this bug shou

Bug#640499: libxvmc: please add multiarch support

2012-12-07 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 00:43:55 +0100, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote: > MultiArch support is a release goal, and the fix for this bug is > clearly not invasive nor big: > The release goal was to get rid of ia32-libs. Which is now done. Anything beyond that can, and will, wait for jessie. Ch

Bug#640499: libxvmc: please add multiarch support

2012-12-06 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2012-12-07 00:43, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote: > MultiArch support is a release goal, and the fix for this bug is clearly not > invasive nor big: > > $ curl -s > 'http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=5;filename=0001-build-for-multiarch.patch;att=1;bug=640499' > | diffstat >

Bug#640499: libxvmc: please add multiarch support

2012-12-06 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
On 06/12/12 22:57, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 20:36:25 +0100, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote: > >> Shouldn't this bug be marked as RC ? >> > No. > >> Please _maintainers_: just upload the damn fix! >> > https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2012/06/msg9.html >

Bug#640499: libxvmc: please add multiarch support

2012-12-06 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 20:36:25 +0100, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote: > Shouldn't this bug be marked as RC ? > No. > Please _maintainers_: just upload the damn fix! > https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2012/06/msg9.html Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital si

Bug#640499: libxvmc: please add multiarch support

2012-12-06 Thread Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
I can confirm this issue. $ uname -m x86_64 $ sudo aptitude install libxvmc1:i386 The following NEW packages will be installed: libxvmc1:i386{b} 0 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 8 not upgraded. Need to get 24,0 kB of archives. After unpacking 76,8 kB will be used. The fo

Bug#640499: libxvmc: please add multiarch support

2012-10-31 Thread lee
Package: libxvmc1 Version: 2:1.0.7-1 Followup-For: Bug #640499 Dear Maintainer, *** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** libxvmc1 cannot be installed together with libxvmc1:i386 in brokenarch. *** End of the template - remove these lines *** -- System Information:

Bug#640499: libxvmc: please add multiarch support

2012-10-16 Thread Helmar Schütz
Hi, either the patch by op didn't work for me or I did something wrong. I need the i386 package to run games on playonlinux via wine and other programs. Is there any way I can get this to work? Or would it be possible to add multiarch support for this package, since it is really important to

Bug#640499: libxvmc: please add multiarch support

2012-10-15 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2012-10-15 21:13, Hussain AlMutawa wrote: > Hi, > > Just reporting. I am using the proprietary nvidia driver on debian > sid. Androids Emulator requires the 32 bit version of openGL. Which > can not be installed because of this bug. use the nvidia driver packages from unstable which has a work

Bug#640499: libxvmc: please add multiarch support

2012-10-15 Thread Hussain AlMutawa
Hi, Just reporting. I am using the proprietary nvidia driver on debian sid. Androids Emulator requires the 32 bit version of openGL. Which can not be installed because of this bug. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co

Bug#640499: libxvmc: please add multiarch support

2012-09-28 Thread Maxime Lombard
Hi Andreas, Thanks to help us. :) But i have a question about your alternate package (libxvmc1-i386). If you can't upload your package in Wheezy before the release, why the problem will be release for the new Debian Stable ? Thanks to wheezy-backports, others ? Cheers, Max

Bug#640499: libxvmc: please add multiarch support

2012-09-24 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Nicolas Le Cam (24/09/2012): > Now that latest 304.43-1 nvidia binary drivers have been migrated to > testing, it is adverted to switch from *nvidia*-ia32 packages to > multiarch ones using : […] File a bug against that documentation then. It'd been repeated several times already: it is too late

Bug#640499: libxvmc: please add multiarch support

2012-09-24 Thread Nicolas Le Cam
Dear Maintainer, Now that latest 304.43-1 nvidia binary drivers have been migrated to testing, it is adverted to switch from *nvidia*-ia32 packages to multiarch ones using : dpkg --add-architecture i386 apt-get update apt-get install libgl1-nvidia-glx:i386 apt-get install nvidia-vdpau-driver:i386

Bug#640499: libxvmc: please add multiarch support

2012-09-24 Thread Sébastien NOEL
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 20:20:40 +0200 Julien Cristau wrote: On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 12:56:23 +0200, Ralf Jung wrote: > Why that? > This would effectively mean broken OpenGL for i386 apps on systems > using the proprietary NVidia driver. The patch from the original > report is simple and working on

Bug#640499: libxvmc: please add multiarch support

2012-09-22 Thread Maxime Lombard
> Because if there's two things in the world I don't care about it's wine > and the nvidia driver. So I won't spend any of my free time trying to > unbreak them when I've got more important things to do. > > Ok, you are more important things to do but this bug concern your package. Like i said (an

Bug#640499: libxvmc: please add multiarch support

2012-09-21 Thread Craig Sanders
> > Because if there's two things in the world I don't care about it's > > wine and the nvidia driver. So I won't spend any of my free time > > trying to unbreak them when I've got more important things to do. > > This is not just about wine, there are other 32bit-only apps requiring > OpenGL. Goo

Bug#640499: libxvmc: please add multiarch support

2012-09-19 Thread Ralf Jung
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, >>> I don't think so. >> Why that? This would effectively mean broken OpenGL for i386 apps >> on systems using the proprietary NVidia driver. The patch from >> the original report is simple and working on several people's >> systems. The dpkg iss

Bug#640499: libxvmc: please add multiarch support

2012-09-19 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 12:56:23 +0200, Ralf Jung wrote: > Hi, > > >> Just a question, this bug will be resolved for the Wheezy release ? > > > > I don't think so. > Why that? > This would effectively mean broken OpenGL for i386 apps on systems using > the proprietary NVidia driver. The patch fr

Bug#640499: libxvmc: please add multiarch support

2012-09-19 Thread Ralf Jung
Hi, >> Just a question, this bug will be resolved for the Wheezy release ? > > I don't think so. Why that? This would effectively mean broken OpenGL for i386 apps on systems using the proprietary NVidia driver. The patch from the original report is simple and working on several people's systems.

Bug#640499: libxvmc: please add multiarch support

2012-09-16 Thread Maxime Lombard
Strange, because this bug affect Testing 64Bits and Nvidia drivers and others apps like Wine, GoogleEarth etc...

Bug#640499: libxvmc: please add multiarch support

2012-09-16 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 11:37:41 +0200, Maxime Lombard wrote: > Hi, > > Just a question, this bug will be resolved for the Wheezy release ? I don't think so. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#640499: libxvmc: please add multiarch support

2012-09-16 Thread Maxime Lombard
Hi, Just a question, this bug will be resolved for the Wheezy release ?

Bug#640499: libxvmc: please add multiarch support

2012-08-18 Thread Ralf Jung
Hi, > Have the upgrade and install paths paths of this scenario been tested? And > the > case of locally modified/removed config files? > > I'll take libfoo as an example package that ships /etc/foo.conf > [snip] > > Just curious ... Whatever happens here is not specific to libxvmc - see libp

Bug#640499: libxvmc: please add multiarch support

2012-08-17 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On Tuesday, 14. August 2012 11:35:21 Ralf Jung wrote: > As it turned out, the conffile issue is actually a bug in dpkg [1]. In > theory (and once dpkg is fixed), it is perfectly fine to have a conffile in > an MA: same package, as long as the content is the same for all > architectures. Have the u

Bug#640499: libxvmc: please add multiarch support

2012-08-14 Thread Ralf Jung
As it turned out, the conffile issue is actually a bug in dpkg [1]. In theory (and once dpkg is fixed), it is perfectly fine to have a conffile in an MA: same package, as long as the content is the same for all architectures. Since the libxvmc wrapper uses dlopen, which uses the correct library

Bug#640499: libxvmc: please add multiarch support [PATCH]

2012-08-12 Thread Ralf Jung
tags 640499 + patch thanks Attached you can find a patch which moves the conffile into a separate package. However, it seems the conffile problem is already in the archive: For example, libmap-modules is MA: same and has a conffile, showing the same problems as this package with just the path b

Bug#640499: libxvmc: please add multiarch support

2012-06-18 Thread Sebastien NOEL
Le 2012-05-20 15:25, Cyril Brulebois a écrit : It's a well-known fact the X Strike Force has way too much manpower, and really enjoys stalling everything. it's also a well-known fact that being rude and agressive is perfectly normal for DD from France... "pete un coup, ça ira mieux apres"

Bug#640499: libxvmc: please add multiarch support

2012-05-20 Thread Ralf Jung
Hi, > Ralf Jung (20/05/2012): > > is there any progress on this? This package is blocking > > libgl1-nvidia-glx from being installable in a foreign architecture, > > thereby preventing a proper multiarch migration for systems using the > > proprietary nvidia driver. > > It's a well-known fact th

Bug#640499: libxvmc: please add multiarch support

2012-05-20 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Ralf Jung (20/05/2012): > is there any progress on this? This package is blocking > libgl1-nvidia-glx from being installable in a foreign architecture, > thereby preventing a proper multiarch migration for systems using the > proprietary nvidia driver. It's a well-known fact the X Strike Force ha

Bug#640499: libxvmc: please add multiarch support

2012-05-20 Thread Ralf Jung
Hi, is there any progress on this? This package is blocking libgl1-nvidia-glx from being installable in a foreign architecture, thereby preventing a proper multiarch migration for systems using the proprietary nvidia driver. Kind regards, Ralf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-re

Bug#640499: libxvmc: please add multiarch support

2011-09-05 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: libxvmc Version: 2:1.0.6-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Please rebuild libxvmc with multiarch support. Attached patch is modeled after the multiarch changes in libxv. I'm not sure how to handle /etc/X11/XvMCConfig correctly, might have to be moved to a separate package libxvmc-config?