On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 11:26 +0800, Antonio Borneo wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 5:14 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 08:24 +0800, Antonio Borneo wrote:
> >> no reason, should be applied.
> >> I'll commit it in the weekend.
> >
> > If you don't want to just delete vpnc-scrip
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 5:14 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 08:24 +0800, Antonio Borneo wrote:
>> no reason, should be applied.
>> I'll commit it in the weekend.
>
> If you don't want to just delete vpnc-script from the vpnc repo, then it
> would be best to pull in *all* the fi
On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 08:24 +0800, Antonio Borneo wrote:
> no reason, should be applied.
> I'll commit it in the weekend.
If you don't want to just delete vpnc-script from the vpnc repo, then it
would be best to pull in *all* the fixes from the git tree rather than
diverging.
In fact, if you wan
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 6:29 AM, Florian Schlichting
wrote:
> David, Antonio, Eric:
>
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 09:45:17AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
>> On Sat, 2011-09-10 at 15:52 +0800, Antonio Borneo wrote:
>> >
>> > In the fix you provide,
>> > 1) you add ";s/ipid 0x//g" at the end of s
On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 23:29 +0100, Florian Schlichting wrote:
> > I was just thinking that I should submit a patch which removes the
> > out-of-date script from vpnc altogether. There have been a number of
> > other fixes in the git tree too.
>
> What do you mean "remove" the script from vpnc - ho
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:34:40PM +, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Note: That "fuzz" you speak of when applying the patch... that's due to
> the rest of the fixes to vpnc-script since it was imported into its own
> git repo, surely?
yes, the line numbers don't match - there are another 23 lines in
David, Antonio, Eric:
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 09:45:17AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-09-10 at 15:52 +0800, Antonio Borneo wrote:
> >
> > In the fix you provide,
> > 1) you add ";s/ipid 0x//g" at the end of string.
> >This does not impact backward compatibility. I'm in fav
On Sat, 2011-09-10 at 15:52 +0800, Antonio Borneo wrote:
>
> In the fix you provide,
> 1) you add ";s/ipid 0x//g" at the end of string.
>This does not impact backward compatibility. I'm in favour to
> commit it.
It's not sufficient. We originally had this in the vpnc-scripts.git
repositor
(Resending to Debian bug since I just got a bizarre complaint that my
reply didn't have a Package: line at the start. Perhaps it didn't like
the original mail being S/MIME signed?)
On Sat, 2011-09-10 at 15:52 +0800, Antonio Borneo wrote:
> In the fix you provide,
> 1) you add ";s/ipid 0x//g" a
9 matches
Mail list logo
