tag 641155 + pending
thanks
On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 17:45 +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> On 18.01.2012 17:34, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> []
> >> So I think it is ready to be uploaded to pu. Should I do so or
> >> should I post another debdiff for review?
> >
> > If the only change since the previou
On 18.01.2012 17:34, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[]
>> So I think it is ready to be uploaded to pu. Should I do so or
>> should I post another debdiff for review?
>
> If the only change since the previous debdiff is the removal of the duplicate
> changelog entry, please go ahead. If there's anything
On 18.01.2012 12:55, Michael Tokarev wrote:
On 14.01.2012 20:40, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[]
+ * Schedule start/stop of mdadm-raid before/after filesystems
are
+checked&mounted/unmounted; thanks to Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
+(closes: #611632).
[...]
+ * Make mdadm-raid init script depend
On 14.01.2012 20:40, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[]
>>> + * Schedule start/stop of mdadm-raid before/after filesystems are
>>> +checked&mounted/unmounted; thanks to Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
>>> +(closes: #611632).
>>> [...]
>>> + * Make mdadm-raid init script depend on hostname; thanks to Mario
On Sat, 2012-01-14 at 20:23 +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> On 14.01.2012 19:50, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > + * Fix checkarray script so that it does not die after scheduling the
> > first
> > +device when there is no scheduling class specified; thanks to Mario
> > +'BitKoenig' Holbe (clo
On 14.01.2012 19:50, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 12:33 +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> So, after quite some time, I'm attempting another upload of mdadm to
>> stable-pu. All the changes were sitting in testing for half a year,
>> and were backported into stable/squeeze version.
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 12:33 +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> So, after quite some time, I'm attempting another upload of mdadm to
> stable-pu. All the changes were sitting in testing for half a year,
> and were backported into stable/squeeze version.
>
> As before, the proposed changes are only in
In a previous life, on 11.09.2011 02:09, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 01:09:35AM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> We'd like to upload a bugfix release of mdadm package for the
>> next squeeze point release. There are mostly cosmetic changes,
>> but some of the bugs are very annoyi
also sprach Michael Tokarev [2011.09.11.0846 +0200]:
> So I have to upload this "squeeze1" version to unstable,
No, we prepare 3.2.2-1 for unstable, which contains all the fixes we
propose for squeeze1. Once 3.2.2-1 moves to testing, we cherry-pick
the fixes into a new squeeze1 package.
--
.''
On 11.09.2011 02:09, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 01:09:35AM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> We'd like to upload a bugfix release of mdadm package for the
>> next squeeze point release. There are mostly cosmetic changes,
>> but some of the bugs are very annoying and already made
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 01:09:35AM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> We'd like to upload a bugfix release of mdadm package for the
> next squeeze point release. There are mostly cosmetic changes,
> but some of the bugs are very annoying and already made quite
> some users unhappy - like the famous #
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Severity: normal
Hello.
We'd like to upload a bugfix release of mdadm package for the
next squeeze point release. There are mostly cosmetic changes,
but some of th
12 matches
Mail list logo
