On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Dominique Belhachemi wrote:
> The original license "PBS_License.txt" contains:
>
> 5. [...] all modifications and additions to the Software must be freely
> redistributable by any party
>(including Licensor) without restriction.
>
> But the "TORQUE v2.5+ Softwar
Michael,
There is some confusion about the TORQUE license and how it affects its
distribution.
I am forwarding this thread to you I have had with Dominique Belhachemi to
see if we can help get some clarity on the licensing issue.
Regards
Ken
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Dominique Belhachemi
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Dominique Belhachemi wrote:
> The original license "PBS_License.txt" contains:
>
> 5. [...] all modifications and additions to the Software must be freely
> redistributable by any party
>(including Licensor) without restriction.
>
> But the "TORQUE v2.5+ Softwar
The original license "PBS_License.txt" contains:
5. [...] all modifications and additions to the Software must be freely
redistributable by any party
(including Licensor) without restriction.
But the "TORQUE v2.5+ Software License v1.1" contains additional
restrictions.
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Dominique Belhachemi wrote:
> Unfortunately this means that TORQUE 2.5 and later cannot be uploaded to
> any distributions due to the license conflict.
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2012/01/msg00046.html
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Ken Nielson <
Unfortunately this means that TORQUE 2.5 and later cannot be uploaded to
any distributions due to the license conflict.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2012/01/msg00046.html
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Ken Nielson wrote:
> Dominique,
>
> The license applies to all TORQUE releases from
Dominique,
The license applies to all TORQUE releases from 2.5 and later. Is that what
you need or do you want it to be in the license itself.
Ken
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Dominique Belhachemi wrote:
> Ken,
>
> Could you please clarify which parts of TORQUE fall under the additional
> "T
Ken,
Could you please clarify which parts of TORQUE fall under the additional
"TORQUE v2.5+ Software License v1.1" license?
Thanks
-Dominique
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Dominique Belhachemi wrote:
> Upstream finally reverted the license change which blocked the upload into
> Debian. See
Upstream finally reverted the license change which blocked the upload into
Debian. See
http://www.supercluster.org/pipermail/torquedev/2012-January/003946.html
commit 57552897eb5d6fd8304a514c00b4b8804f840bd1
Author: Ken
Date: Fri May 3 09:30:22 2013 -0600
updated TORQUE License file
ht
We would also want additional hands for the maintenance, I presume. As long as
2.4 is supported I do not think we should drop it. Cheers, Steffen
Dominique Belhachemi schrieb:
>> The 2.5.x branch will continue to have minor features and
>> functionality added to it. The build has been deploy
> The 2.5.x branch will continue to have minor features and
> functionality added to it. The build has been deployed successfully in
> many environments and is considered reliable. Build
> torque-2.5.5.tar.gz is the latest release and the one we recommend
> most sites use.
>
That branch is also bas
Package: torque
Version: 2.4.16
Distribution: Sid
Since version 2.5.4, Torque has the ability to schedule gpus. It would
be nice to see it packaged, as gpus are currently really presents
As per the link and quote below, the vendor recommends the version
2.5.x if no NUMA architecture is required a
12 matches
Mail list logo
