Bug#641513: timerfd_settime(2) does not cover the old_value == NULL case

2011-09-14 Thread Michael Kerrisk
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 7:48 AM, Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org wrote: On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 07:42:45AM +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote: Hi Josh! Hi Michael!  Nice talking to you again after LPC. :) See you again in Prague? Cheers, Michael On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 5:45 AM, Josh

Bug#641513: timerfd_settime(2) does not cover the old_value == NULL case

2011-09-14 Thread Josh Triplett
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 06:18:02AM +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote: On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 7:48 AM, Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org wrote: On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 07:42:45AM +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote: Hi Josh! Hi Michael!  Nice talking to you again after LPC. :) See you again in

Bug#641513: timerfd_settime(2) does not cover the old_value == NULL case

2011-09-13 Thread Josh Triplett
Package: manpages-dev Version: 3.32-0.2 Severity: normal File: /usr/share/man/man2/timerfd_settime.2.gz timerfd_settime(2) states that The old_value argument returns a structure containing the setting of the timer that was current at the time of the call; however, it does not mention that the

Bug#641513: timerfd_settime(2) does not cover the old_value == NULL case

2011-09-13 Thread Michael Kerrisk
tags 641513 fixed-upstream thanks Hi Josh! On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 5:45 AM, Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org wrote: Package: manpages-dev Version: 3.32-0.2 Severity: normal File: /usr/share/man/man2/timerfd_settime.2.gz timerfd_settime(2) states that The old_value argument returns a

Bug#641513: timerfd_settime(2) does not cover the old_value == NULL case

2011-09-13 Thread Josh Triplett
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 07:42:45AM +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote: Hi Josh! Hi Michael! Nice talking to you again after LPC. :) On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 5:45 AM, Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org wrote: Package: manpages-dev Version: 3.32-0.2 Severity: normal File: