Bug#641898: [Evolution] Bug#641898: libebook: e_book_get_changes always reports no changes in libebook evolution data server

2011-09-29 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On jeu., 2011-09-29 at 19:19 -0400, Chris Frey wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:17:19PM -0400, Chris Frey wrote: > > The patch is below. > > Hi, > > I haven't heard back yet, on this bug. I'm *really* hoping that the fix > can be included in the next Debian update. I guess it won't. I was [V

Bug#641898: [Evolution] Bug#641898: libebook: e_book_get_changes always reports no changes in libebook evolution data server

2011-09-29 Thread Chris Frey
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:17:19PM -0400, Chris Frey wrote: > The patch is below. Hi, I haven't heard back yet, on this bug. I'm *really* hoping that the fix can be included in the next Debian update. Is there anything I can do to help this process? Thanks! - Chris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai

Bug#641898: [Evolution] Bug#641898: libebook: e_book_get_changes always reports no changes in libebook evolution data server

2011-09-22 Thread Chris Frey
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 11:04:42AM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > It might be worth identifiying when the bug was closed upstream and see > if it's possible to backport that fix to stable. Not something I'll be > able to do soon though, but if you manage to identify a relevant patch, > that woul

Bug#641898: [Evolution] Bug#641898: libebook: e_book_get_changes always reports no changes in libebook evolution data server

2011-09-17 Thread Chris Frey
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 10:10:23AM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > version: 3.0.3-1 > tag 641898 squeeze > thanks > On sam., 2011-09-17 at 03:03 -0400, Chris Frey wrote: > > I tested my own code on Debian Sid, with version 3.0.3, and it worked, so > > it seems Squeeze-specific. > > Ok so closing

Bug#641898: [Evolution] Bug#641898: libebook: e_book_get_changes always reports no changes in libebook evolution data server

2011-09-17 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On sam., 2011-09-17 at 04:42 -0400, Chris Frey wrote: > Does this mean it is "closed" in Squeeze as well? I was hoping for > a fix in Squeeze (or at least keep it open). I'm not sure what the tag means, > and I don't see it via the web anymore. Closing means the bug is fixed. Versioning indicate

Bug#641898: libebook: e_book_get_changes always reports no changes in libebook evolution data server

2011-09-17 Thread Chris Frey
Subject: libebook: e_book_get_changes always reports no changes in libebook evolution data server Package: libebook1.2-9 Version: 2.30.3-2 File: libebook Severity: important *** Please type your report below this line *** When using the e_book_get_changes() function on Debian Squeeze, I am unabl