reassign 642154 src:linux
thanks
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 01:00:45AM +0300, rush wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 3.0.0-3
> Severity: important
> Tags: upstream
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I have some suspicious activities on my server: i've continiously repeated
> messages in dmesg about "B
OK, I tried it again, but Oops didn't gone.
menuentry 'Debian GNU/Linux, with Xen 4.0-amd64 and Linux
3.0.0-1-amd64' --class debian --class gnu-linux --class gnu --class os
--class xen {
insmod raid
insmod mdraid1x
insmod lvm
insmod part_msdos
insmod part_ms
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 14:47 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > echo'Loading Xen 4.0-amd64 ...'
> > multiboot /boot/xen-4.0-amd64.gz placeholder
>
> Oops. I meant to try it in the hypervisor - so right after placeholder add
> "xsave=0"
Which in grub2 means add GRUB_
> echo'Loading Xen 4.0-amd64 ...'
> multiboot /boot/xen-4.0-amd64.gz placeholder
Oops. I meant to try it in the hypervisor - so right after placeholder add
"xsave=0"
> echo'Loading Linux 3.0.0-1-amd64 ...'
> module /boot/vmlinuz-3.0.0-1-amd64 placeh
Unfortunately, xsave=0 didn't give any effect. Oops is still here.
[ 21.095558] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 8803bb7c5000
[ 21.095827] IP: [] __sanitize_i387_state+0x23/0xe1
[ 21.096002] PGD 1604067 PUD 3d82d9067 PMD 3d84b5067 PTE 0
[ 21.096355] Oops: [#1] SMP
[
On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 11:01 +0400, rush wrote:
> 2011/10/1, Jonathan Nieder :
> >
> > Cc-ing the reporter. Rush, are you able to reproduce the oops you
> > mentioned? Does adding noxsave to the kernel command line help?
> >
>
> I'm sorry, i'm not guru in such questions.
> Do I need to specify xs
2011/10/1, Jonathan Nieder :
>
> Cc-ing the reporter. Rush, are you able to reproduce the oops you
> mentioned? Does adding noxsave to the kernel command line help?
>
I'm sorry, i'm not guru in such questions.
Do I need to specify xsave=0 in grub boot options or there is another
way to do it?
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> There's been some similar looking threads on xen-devel recently but I
>> haven't paid attention to the details, list & Konrad CC'd. Full log is
>> at http://bugs.debian.org/642154.
>
> Does xsave=0 make a difference?
Cc-ing the reporter. Rush, are you able to repr
> There's been some similar looking threads on xen-devel recently but I
> haven't paid attention to the details, list & Konrad CC'd. Full log is
> at http://bugs.debian.org/642154.
Does xsave=0 make a difference?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subj
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 14:20 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 10:12 +0400, rush wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > There are several Not tainted lines in old messages file. There are all of
> > them:
> >
> > Sep 10 22:35:33 xen-dom0 kernel: [24183.985513] Pid: 2605, comm:
> > debootstrap N
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 10:12 +0400, rush wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There are several Not tainted lines in old messages file. There are all of
> them:
>
> Sep 10 22:35:33 xen-dom0 kernel: [24183.985513] Pid: 2605, comm:
> debootstrap Not tainted 3.0.0-1-amd64 #1 Intel Corporation
> S1200BTL/S1200BTL
> Sep
Hi,
There are several Not tainted lines in old messages file. There are all of them:
Sep 10 22:35:33 xen-dom0 kernel: [24183.985513] Pid: 2605, comm:
debootstrap Not tainted 3.0.0-1-amd64 #1 Intel Corporation
S1200BTL/S1200BTL
Sep 10 22:35:33 xen-dom0 kernel: [24183.985621] RIP:
e030:[] []
__san
Hi,
rush wrote:
> I have some suspicious activities on my server: i've continiously repeated
> messages in dmesg about "BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request"
Yes, if this server is open to the public (especially if it has
untrusted local users), you should probably take it down. A kern
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 3.0.0-3
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainer,
I have some suspicious activities on my server: i've continiously repeated
messages in dmesg about "BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request", also
there are many messages like
Message from syslogd@xen
14 matches
Mail list logo
