On 18/06/12 14:45, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 13:04 +0200, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>
>> I have re-uploaded it to mentors.debian.net
>
> Please make it -3 since -2 is already in NEW.
>
Done... made a new changelog entry (-3) and re-uploaded to mentors
Looks ok now?
Tha
On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 13:04 +0200, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> I have re-uploaded it to mentors.debian.net
Please make it -3 since -2 is already in NEW.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On 18/06/12 07:26, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 08:08 +0200, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>
>> Wishing to hear any comments.
>
> Oh, one more thing, how about a README.Debian explaining the situation
> with OpenSSL and how to rebuild the package with OpenSSL instead, for
> those
On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 08:08 +0200, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> Wishing to hear any comments.
Oh, one more thing, how about a README.Debian explaining the situation
with OpenSSL and how to rebuild the package with OpenSSL instead, for
those users who want the extra speed?
--
bye,
pabs
h
Hello,
I have just packaged and updated a new version of aircrack-ng.
I have completely reworked the package. I switched to dh for
debian/rules and also switched debian/copyright to machine-readable format.
I backported the GnuTLS patch to aircrack-ng 1.1 and also I
cherry-picked a few other pat
Hi,
David Francos wrote (01 May 2012 12:15:15 GMT) :
> Thank you, I'll fix this as soon as possible, I've been forced to
> leave all this behind for a while, hope to be able to catch with
> it soon.
Any chance you, or Carlos (who still owns the ITP bug) or anyone else
fixes this in time for the W
2012/5/1 Petr Baudis :
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 04:47:17PM +0100, David Francos wrote:
>> Also, I should say it, I'm making a package from the svn revision, and
>> it's much easier to package, and has much less lintian warnings (if
>> some), you can have a look at the source of the packag
Hi!
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 04:47:17PM +0100, David Francos wrote:
> Also, I should say it, I'm making a package from the svn revision, and
> it's much easier to package, and has much less lintian warnings (if
> some), you can have a look at the source of the package at
> http://github.com/XayOn
Hi,
Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote (02 Apr 2012 15:52:53 GMT) :
> On 15/02/12 16:47, David Francos wrote:
>> We're almost there, don't let this stop.
> Yes, seems that this issue with the license is finally being
> resolved. Thanks a lot for your work :)
Thanks a lot to everyone who made this
On 15/02/12 16:47, David Francos wrote:
> Hi, I've taken bug http://trac.aircrack-ng.org/ticket/953 at aircrack-ng.
> I've resolved almost all the license issues, except two files from
> hirte, whom I'm having trouble to contact, and the file crctable.h <
> http://trac.aircrack-ng.org/svn/trunk/src
Hi, I've taken bug http://trac.aircrack-ng.org/ticket/953 at aircrack-ng.
I've resolved almost all the license issues, except two files from
hirte, whom I'm having trouble to contact, and the file crctable.h <
http://trac.aircrack-ng.org/svn/trunk/src/crctable.h > whose author we
have not yet ident
On 03/12/11 05:52, Paul Wise wrote:
> Non-blockers that would be nice to have fixed:
Reported upstream:
http://trac.aircrack-ng.org/ticket/956
http://trac.aircrack-ng.org/ticket/957
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sat, 2011-11-26 at 11:45 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Non-blockers that would be nice to have fixed:
cppcheck finds quite a few issues:
[src/airdecloak-ng.c:1128]: (error) Memory leak: ivs_table
[src/airodump-ng.c:6353]: (error) Possible null pointer dereference: ap_cur -
otherwise it is redun
On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 04:57 +0100, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> On 27/11/11 03:35, Paul Wise wrote:
> > I'm surprised there were only two such files. Indeed I would expect
> > src/sha1-sse2.S to also be one such file (it is part GPL, part public
> > domain), but you seem to have missed that.
On 27/11/11 03:35, Paul Wise wrote:
> I'm surprised there were only two such files. Indeed I would expect
> src/sha1-sse2.S to also be one such file (it is part GPL, part public
> domain), but you seem to have missed that.
I was not sure about src/sha1-sse2.S since it contains only assembly
code a
On Sat, 2011-11-26 at 21:03 +0100, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> Thanks for notifying this (my fault for not checked it in advance).
>
> I have scanned all the source code and I found two files that are
> linking with OpenSSL and are GPL licensed without an exception to allow
> this.
>
> I
On 26/11/11 04:45, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-11-26 at 03:02 +0100, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>
>> dget -x
>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/aircrack-ng/aircrack-ng_1.1-2.dsc
>
> Blockers for the upload:
>
> The OpenSSL and GPL licenses are incompatible. A number of f
On Sat, 2011-11-26 at 03:02 +0100, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> dget -x
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/aircrack-ng/aircrack-ng_1.1-2.dsc
Blockers for the upload:
The OpenSSL and GPL licenses are incompatible. A number of files do not
have the OpenSSL exception to the GPL.
On 25/11/11 21:47, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have just packaged and updated a new version of aircrack-ng based on
> the previous one from Adam Cécile.
>
> I uploaded it to mentors.debian.net
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/aircrack-ng
>
> Once it enters into debian
On 09/11/11 17:05, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 13:27 +0100, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>
>> I wish to take care of the aircrack-ng package if it is still possible.
>
> Excellent!
>
>> I would also like to seize this opportunity to become Debian Maintainer,
>> a thing that has
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 13:27 +0100, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> I wish to take care of the aircrack-ng package if it is still possible.
Excellent!
> I would also like to seize this opportunity to become Debian Maintainer,
> a thing that has been in my TODO list for a long time.
Also good
Hi!
Am 09.11.2011 16:25, schrieb Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez:
[..]
> I wish to take care of the aircrack-ng package if it is still possible.
[..]
> What would be the first step? Create a new package for aircrack-ng
> fixing the licensing issue?
Please see http://bugs.debian.org/588588#131. The li
On 28/10/11 09:20, Paul Wise wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> If any of you are willing to take over the aircrack-ng package and fix
> the licensing issue, I would be happy to provide sponsorship for it,
> especially if you are willing to join the Debian wireless team.
>
Hello Paul,
I wish to take care of
23 matches
Mail list logo
