> Switching to testing would give you a more ârecentâ stack, but you could
> drag a lot of breaka^Wfun with other packages and upgrade paths which
> might not be well tested yet. ;-)
I'll settle for the fun ;-)
Eddy.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian
Edward Welbourne (02/12/2011):
> > There's 1:6.14.2-1~bpo60+1 (and a newer X stack) in squeeze-backports if
> > you want to try something.
>
> Thanks - I interpolate that this newer X stack exists in a more recent
> release of Debian. The given machine's /etc/issue reports Debian 6.0;
> which I
> There's 1:6.14.2-1~bpo60+1 (and a newer X stack) in squeeze-backports if
> you want to try something.
Thanks - I interpolate that this newer X stack exists in a more recent
release of Debian. The given machine's /etc/issue reports Debian 6.0;
which I see is squeeze, with wheezy in testing. I t
Edward Welbourne (01/12/2011):
> and, I take it, no newer radeon driver for X is available. The perils
> of letting sysadmin give me a shiny new box with a very modern
> graphics card, I guess :-(
There's 1:6.14.2-1~bpo60+1 (and a newer X stack) in squeeze-backports if
you want to try something.
> This crash is fixed in the current upstream driver (as of 6.14.1), but
> only by disallowing rotation when acceleration is disabled.
ah. That is sad.
>> Build Operating System: Linux 2.6.37-trunk-amd64 x86_64 Debian
> [...]
>> (--) RADEON(0): Chipset: "ATI Radeon HD 5450" (ChipID = 0x68f9)
>
On Don, 2011-12-01 at 14:08 +0100, Edward Welbourne wrote:
>
> [...] quarter of an hour ago, I
> tried starting a plain user X session and, in an rxvt, typing "xrandr
> -o left", which shut down that X session hard. This got a crash
> dump:
>
>
> Wed Oct 5 17:50:53 2011 xdm info (pid 6536):
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:42:45 +0200, Edward Welbourne wrote:
> Off-list to avoid spamming others with large slabs of data !
>
No need to do that, better keep all information available in the bug
log.
For the record, here's the log:
X.Org X Server 1.7.7
Release Date: 2010-05-04
X Protocol Ver
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 22:45:48 +0200, Edward Welbourne wrote:
> Hi again Julien,
>
> and thanks for your assistance.
>
> > Section "Monitor"
> > Identifier ""
> > Option "Rotate" "left"
> > EndSection
>
> I take it you mean an xorg.conf containing *only* this section will
> su
Hi again Julien,
and thanks for your assistance.
> Section "Monitor"
> Identifier ""
> Option "Rotate" "left"
> EndSection
I take it you mean an xorg.conf containing *only* this section will
suffice; any content in xorg.conf will be merged to what would have
been used without it.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 21:20:02 +0200, Edward Welbourne wrote:
> >> Bug: a failing run of dexconf should at least report this !
> >> Reconfiguring xserver-xorg should, ideally, at least fail with $? set
> >> when dexconf fails.
> >>
> > Actually dexconf should stop existing.
>
> OK, and what wil
>> Bug: a failing run of dexconf should at least report this !
>> Reconfiguring xserver-xorg should, ideally, at least fail with $? set
>> when dexconf fails.
>>
> Actually dexconf should stop existing.
OK, and what will create my xorg.conf file ?
Or what do I need to configure, instead, to tell t
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 13:38:54 +0200, Edward Welbourne wrote:
> Bug: a failing run of dexconf should at least report this !
> Reconfiguring xserver-xorg should, ideally, at least fail with $? set
> when dexconf fails.
>
Actually dexconf should stop existing.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
12 matches
Mail list logo
