Bug#644315: this needs more thought

2012-01-19 Thread Roger Leigh
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:22:42PM +0800, Rolf Leggewie wrote: thank you for your comment and patch. I'm not really convinced your approach is the proper one, either. You mention yourself that the whole probing for udev shouldn't really be necessary, that's why I titled my previous mail this

Bug#644315: this needs more thought

2012-01-18 Thread Roger Leigh
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 09:07:24AM +0800, Rolf Leggewie wrote: thank you for the patch, but I'm afraid that approach is overly simplistic and not the proper fix, yet. I've attached an alternative patch which will permit transition to the new location. The old path should be removed after the

Bug#644315: this needs more thought

2012-01-18 Thread Rolf Leggewie
Roger, thank you for your comment and patch. I'm not really convinced your approach is the proper one, either. You mention yourself that the whole probing for udev shouldn't really be necessary, that's why I titled my previous mail this needs more thought, to have a chance to understand what the

Bug#644315: this needs more thought

2012-01-07 Thread Rolf Leggewie
Peter, thank you for the patch, but I'm afraid that approach is overly simplistic and not the proper fix, yet. First, as Michael mentioned, the file paths need to be updated to properly deal with the transition. Alas, that will break lucid support where /run does not exist. My main systems are