Bug#644352: Removal of Slicer (Was: Bug#644352: python2.6 removal)

2013-05-14 Thread Dominique Belhachemi
Hi Andreas, Don't worry. Only the outdated slicer3 will be removed. Slicer4 integration is ongoing and looks good so far. -Dominique On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Dominique, > > I have not checked the issue why slicer is FTBFS but I have the > impression that the

Bug#644352: Removal of Slicer (Was: Bug#644352: python2.6 removal)

2013-05-14 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Dominique, I have not checked the issue why slicer is FTBFS but I have the impression that the number of medical imaging experts in Debian Med team has grown. As far as I understood the comment of Mathieu[1] he just has ignored this topic because of Wheezy release process. I would call remova

Bug#644352: python2.6 removal

2013-05-13 Thread Dominique Belhachemi
Hi Luca, Yes please, go ahead. I will add it back once it is buildable again. -Dominique On May 13, 2013 10:54 AM, "Luca Falavigna" wrote: > Hi Dominique! > > slicer3 is one of the packages needed to be rebuilt to get rid of > python2.6 dependencies. As it currently FTBFS, I wonder whether it >

Bug#644352: python2.6 removal

2013-05-13 Thread Luca Falavigna
Hi Dominique! slicer3 is one of the packages needed to be rebuilt to get rid of python2.6 dependencies. As it currently FTBFS, I wonder whether it would be better to remove it from unstable. Cheers, Luca -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "u

Bug#644352: slicer & Debian

2013-03-11 Thread Dominique Belhachemi
Hi Yaroslav, Slicer4 is compiling well on Debian Wheezy and Sid. Most dependencies are compiled from source as well. (Python, VTK, ITK4,libarchive,curl,...) See e.g. my dashboard submissions on http://slicer.cdash.org/index.php?project=Slicer4 Slicer4 is using customized Python, PythonQT and CTK

Bug#644352: slicer & Debian

2013-03-10 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
Hi Dominique, Could you please refresh my memory on the status of slicer in Debian? Would you need help in maintaining it (e.g. to push forward packaging of slicer4) etc? Thank you in advance! Yaroslav On Fri, 04 May 2012, Dominique Belhachemi wrote: > Hi Yaroslav, > Slicer3 is not supported

Bug#644352: slicer & Debian

2012-05-04 Thread Dominique Belhachemi
Hi Yaroslav, Slicer3 is not supported by upstream anymore. Slicer4 is only supported on amd64 and is still based on non released projects (VTK 5.10, CTK, PythonQt). Slicer4 also comes with a pre-build launcher binary which has to be replaced by our own launcher script. Cheers -Dominique On Fri

Bug#644352: slicer & Debian

2012-05-04 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
Hi Dominique, I wonder if there were any movement in upstream/debian packaging of slicer4? slicer3 is uninstallable in sid as well ATM :-/ -- Yaroslav O. Halchenko Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover,

Bug#644352:

2012-01-19 Thread Dominique Belhachemi
Slicer4 is currently using development versions of pythonqt and ctk. I have to wait for a new upstream release of those packages before I can continue working on the slicer4 package. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?

Bug#644352: don't let Slicer3 migrate to testing

2011-10-04 Thread Dominique Belhachemi
Package: slicer Severity: serious Keep Slicer3 out of testing, I am working on Slicer4... Dominique -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org