Bug#644352: Removal of Slicer (Was: Bug#644352: python2.6 removal)

2013-05-14 Thread Dominique Belhachemi
Hi Andreas, Don't worry. Only the outdated slicer3 will be removed. Slicer4 integration is ongoing and looks good so far. -Dominique On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Dominique, > > I have not checked the issue why slicer is FTBFS but I have the > impression that the

Bug#644352: Removal of Slicer (Was: Bug#644352: python2.6 removal)

2013-05-14 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Dominique, I have not checked the issue why slicer is FTBFS but I have the impression that the number of medical imaging experts in Debian Med team has grown. As far as I understood the comment of Mathieu[1] he just has ignored this topic because of Wheezy release process. I would call remova

Bug#644352: python2.6 removal

2013-05-13 Thread Dominique Belhachemi
Hi Luca, Yes please, go ahead. I will add it back once it is buildable again. -Dominique On May 13, 2013 10:54 AM, "Luca Falavigna" wrote: > Hi Dominique! > > slicer3 is one of the packages needed to be rebuilt to get rid of > python2.6 dependencies. As it currently FTBFS, I wonder whether it >

Bug#644352: python2.6 removal

2013-05-13 Thread Luca Falavigna
Hi Dominique! slicer3 is one of the packages needed to be rebuilt to get rid of python2.6 dependencies. As it currently FTBFS, I wonder whether it would be better to remove it from unstable. Cheers, Luca -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "u