Bug#645762: requestsync: uses SMTP port (25) instead of submission port (587)

2011-10-20 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 11:07 +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote: > Yes. But launchpad already requires credentials. Although now you > mention it, I'm reminded of > https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/252368 > which would work for mail, but not the API. Oh, I thought the mail interface wouldn't req

Bug#645762: requestsync: uses SMTP port (25) instead of submission port (587)

2011-10-20 Thread Stefano Rivera
Hi Paul (2011.10.20_03:56:00_+0200) > Will this require people to input their Launchpad credentials to submit > sync requests? I guess many DDs will not have such credentials. Yes. But launchpad already requires credentials. Although now you mention it, I'm reminded of https://bugs.launchpad.net/l

Bug#645762: requestsync: uses SMTP port (25) instead of submission port (587)

2011-10-19 Thread Paul Wise
retitle 645762 requestsync: please use the Launchpad API by default thanks On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 23:14 +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote: > requestsync can also use Launchpad's API, with the --lp flag (and in > general, this will give a far better experience). > > This will use https (port 443), which

Bug#645762: requestsync: uses SMTP port (25) instead of submission port (587)

2011-10-19 Thread Stefano Rivera
severity 645762 wishlist thanks > Many ISPs block the SMTP port (25) by default, I would suggest that > requestsync should by default use the submission port (587) as codified > in RFC4409. This would require the Launchpad to first accept mail > destined for Launchpad on that port. requestsync ca

Bug#645762: requestsync: uses SMTP port (25) instead of submission port (587)

2011-10-18 Thread Paul Wise
Package: ubuntu-dev-tools Version: 0.132 Severity: normal File: /usr/bin/requestsync Many ISPs block the SMTP port (25) by default, I would suggest that requestsync should by default use the submission port (587) as codified in RFC4409. This would require the Launchpad to first accept mail destine