Hi,
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 01:10:45 +0100 Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Tollef Fog Heen writes:
> > It's a bit confusing that the file names of .debs don't contain the
> > epoch. I think we should change that.
> >
> > I would suggest %-encoding it, so foo-1:1 becomes foo_1%251_all.deb.
> > The reason
Tollef Fog Heen writes:
>> This will break some existing tools and I don't see what we gain from
>> this, esp. when we still need to encode the : in some other way. I'm
>> therefore tagging this bug as wontfix.
>
> Which (known) tools would break because of this? It's not like anything
> should
]] Ansgar Burchardt
> This will break some existing tools and I don't see what we gain from
> this, esp. when we still need to encode the : in some other way. I'm
> therefore tagging this bug as wontfix.
Which (known) tools would break because of this? It's not like anything
should rely on pac
severity 645895 wishlist
tag 645895 + wontfix
thanks
Tollef Fog Heen writes:
> It's a bit confusing that the file names of .debs don't contain the
> epoch. I think we should change that.
>
> I would suggest %-encoding it, so foo-1:1 becomes foo_1%251_all.deb.
> The reason to not include a : verb
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 01:42:06PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> Package: ftp.debian.org
> Severity: normal
>
> (Cc-ed to debian-devel@l.d.o for their input in whether this would cause
> problems anywhere else in the toolchain.)
>
> It's a bit confusing that the file names of .debs don't contai
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011, Ognyan Kulev wrote:
> На 19.10.2011 16:18, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh написа:
> >Well, while % is xml/xhtml/html-friendly, it is *not* http-friendly, and
> >will require double-encoding.
>
> So we have encoding ":" anyway. What about using ".." (horizontal
> ":") - it looks m
На 19.10.2011 16:18, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh написа:
Well, while % is xml/xhtml/html-friendly, it is *not* http-friendly, and
will require double-encoding.
So we have encoding ":" anyway. What about using ".." (horizontal ":")
- it looks much nicer than %-encoding.
Regards,
Ognyan Kulev
On 2011-10-19 13:42, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> It's a bit confusing that the file names of .debs don't contain the
> epoch. I think we should change that.
I would welcome this.
These epoch-related bugs/feature requests may be of interest too:
#551323 (dpkg), #551326 (www.debian.org).
--
Eugene
]] Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
| On Wed, 19 Oct 2011, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
|
| > The first and obvious one is to avoid file name clashes in the
| > archive. Another one is so the version number in the file name actually
| > is the version number of the package which makes it less confusing when
]] Neil Williams
| On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:42:06 +0200
| Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
|
| > Package: ftp.debian.org
| > Severity: normal
| >
| > (Cc-ed to debian-devel@l.d.o for their input in whether this would cause
| > problems anywhere else in the toolchain.)
| >
| > It's a bit confusing that th
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:42:06 +0200
Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> Package: ftp.debian.org
> Severity: normal
>
> (Cc-ed to debian-devel@l.d.o for their input in whether this would cause
> problems anywhere else in the toolchain.)
>
> It's a bit confusing that the file names of .debs don't contain the
]] Tollef Fog Heen
| I would suggest %-encoding it, so foo-1:1 becomes foo_1%251_all.deb.
s/%25/%3a/
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
(Cc-ed to debian-devel@l.d.o for their input in whether this would cause
problems anywhere else in the toolchain.)
It's a bit confusing that the file names of .debs don't contain the
epoch. I think we should change that.
I would suggest %-encoding it, so
13 matches
Mail list logo
