Le mardi 11 novembre 2014 à 03:20:46, Herbert Xu a écrit :
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 04:02:41PM +0100, Harald van Dijk wrote:
> >
> > Even if csh is intentionally in the "See also" section despite not
> > being referenced anywhere else, is it also intentional that chsh is
> > not in that section d
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 04:02:41PM +0100, Harald van Dijk wrote:
>
> Even if csh is intentionally in the "See also" section despite not
> being referenced anywhere else, is it also intentional that chsh is
> not in that section despite the earlier reference? Would a patch
> that leaves csh but als
On 11/10/2014 2:27 PM, Herbert Xu wrote:
Stéphane Aulery wrote:
[-- text/plain, encoding 8bit, charset: utf-8, 12 lines --]
Hello,
Here is a small patch reported by a user of Debian [1]. Could you please
integrate? Thank you for your help.
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu
Stéphane Aulery wrote:
> [-- text/plain, encoding 8bit, charset: utf-8, 12 lines --]
>
> Hello,
>
> Here is a small patch reported by a user of Debian [1]. Could you please
> integrate? Thank you for your help.
>
> [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=646847
This patch also ap
Le lundi 10 novembre 2014 à 09:27:42, Herbert Xu a écrit :
> Stéphane Aulery wrote:
> >
> > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=646847
>
> This patch also appears bogus as csh is an alternative to dash.
That's what I say too. Then I told myself that it was more interesting
tha
5 matches
Mail list logo
