Hi,
On 12/07/2011 05:28 PM, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> * Reto Buerki [21 22:45]:
>
Thanks for preparing a NMU for pcscada. But this is not needed in this
case because I got the new PCSC/Ada version 0.7 almost ready for upload.
>>> Cool! I've rescheduled upload to DELAYED-15
Hi!
* Reto Buerki [21 22:45]:
> >> Thanks for preparing a NMU for pcscada. But this is not needed in this
> >> case because I got the new PCSC/Ada version 0.7 almost ready for upload.
> > Cool! I've rescheduled upload to DELAYED-15, so you'll have time to
> > prepare the upload. Please tell
On 11/21/2011 10:38 PM, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> Il 21/11/2011 22:20, Reto Buerki ha scritto:
>> Thanks for preparing a NMU for pcscada. But this is not needed in this
>> case because I got the new PCSC/Ada version 0.7 almost ready for upload.
>
> Cool! I've rescheduled upload to DELAYED-15, so you
Il 21/11/2011 22:20, Reto Buerki ha scritto:
> Thanks for preparing a NMU for pcscada. But this is not needed in this
> case because I got the new PCSC/Ada version 0.7 almost ready for upload.
Cool! I've rescheduled upload to DELAYED-15, so you'll have time to
prepare the upload. Please tell me if
Hi,
On 11/21/2011 10:03 PM, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> tags 647796 + patch pending
> thanks
>
> I've prepared an NMU for pcscada (versioned as 0.6-2.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
> should delay it longer.
Thanks for preparing a NMU for pcscada. But this is not
tags 647796 + patch pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for pcscada (versioned as 0.6-2.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -u pcscada-0.6/debian/control pcscada-0.6/debian/control
--- pcscada-0.6/debian/control
6 matches
Mail list logo
