Hi all,
so far, it looks pretty stable for today. Since 7 AM (it's 2 PM now) we
have started additional clients (4 now instead of 1 before) and there are
no crashes and everything does work as expected.
No freezed fb_inet_server processes and still some crashes in logs ...
root@server:~# tail -f
On 14. 11. 2011, at 20:44, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
Thanks both for the steps. Rebuilded, installed, testing ... Will let you know
+- Wednesday, when I'll connect another bunch of computers (= clients) to our
network and it will be heavier load than it is now. I'll test on tomorrow with
two client
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Chiefly Izzy wrote:
>
> On 13. 11. 2011, at 12:50, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
>
>> I have prepared packages from the current version in wheezy
>> (2.5.1.26351), built for squeeze.
>>
>> ftp://ftp.modsoftsys.net/public/firebird2.5-backports/
>>
>> If these improve the s
-=| Chiefly Izzy, 14.11.2011 20:16:02 +0100 |=-
>
> On 13. 11. 2011, at 12:50, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
>
> > I have prepared packages from the current version in wheezy
> > (2.5.1.26351), built for squeeze.
> >
> > ftp://ftp.modsoftsys.net/public/firebird2.5-backports/
> >
> > If these improve
On 13. 11. 2011, at 12:50, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> I have prepared packages from the current version in wheezy
> (2.5.1.26351), built for squeeze.
>
> ftp://ftp.modsoftsys.net/public/firebird2.5-backports/
>
> If these improve the situation, then we at least know the bug is fixed
> in that v
-=| Chiefly Izzy, 11.11.2011 12:57:12 +0100 |=-
>
> On 10. 11. 2011, at 22:36, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
>
> > Hmm. There are about 350 potentially useful commits between 2.5.0 RC3
> > and 2.5.0 final. Lots of them claim to be fixing server crashes :(
> >
> > Robert, is there an easy way to make the
On 10. 11. 2011, at 22:36, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> Hmm. There are about 350 potentially useful commits between 2.5.0 RC3
> and 2.5.0 final. Lots of them claim to be fixing server crashes :(
>
> Robert, is there an easy way to make the server crash? Having such
> a procedure would help testing a
-=| Damyan Ivanov, 10.11.2011 22:01:55 +0200 |=-
> -=| marius adrian popa, 09.11.2011 22:10:21 +0200 |=-
> > I also see that you are using ReleaseCandidate3
> > maybe we should prepare a backport
>
> A backport won't fix the problem for other users of stable.
>
> I'll look at the upstream changes
-=| marius adrian popa, 09.11.2011 22:10:21 +0200 |=-
> I also see that you are using ReleaseCandidate3
> maybe we should prepare a backport
A backport won't fix the problem for other users of stable.
I'll look at the upstream changes in the 2.5 branch after the third
release candidate. Maybe th
On 9. 11. 2011, at 20:51, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> Even to the classic server? That's strange since fb_inet_server is run
> from inetd/xinetd and if you can't connect there is something terribly
> wrong somewhere.
Sorry, I used wrong words here. I can telnet to port 3050, so, (x)inetd does
work
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> -=| Robert Vojta, 09.11.2011 18:02:08 +0100 |=-
>> Package: firebird2.5-classic
>> Version: 2.5.0.26054~ReleaseCandidate3.ds2-1+b1
>> Severity: important
>> Tags: squeeze
I also see that you are using ReleaseCandidate3
maybe we should prepar
-=| Robert Vojta, 09.11.2011 18:02:08 +0100 |=-
> Package: firebird2.5-classic
> Version: 2.5.0.26054~ReleaseCandidate3.ds2-1+b1
> Severity: important
> Tags: squeeze
>
> Firebird, namely fb_inet_server, segfaults several times per day. I tried
> -super, -superclassic too, but the classic one is c
Package: firebird2.5-classic
Version: 2.5.0.26054~ReleaseCandidate3.ds2-1+b1
Severity: important
Tags: squeeze
Firebird, namely fb_inet_server, segfaults several times per day. I tried
-super, -superclassic too, but the classic one is crashing less frequently
than others.
I'm running it on fully
13 matches
Mail list logo
