Le Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 05:55:06PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder a écrit :
>
> -Another kind of list value has one value per line. For example,
> +Another type of field has one value per line. For example,
Thanks to you and Justin for the proofreading. I have committed the change
Justin B Rye wrote:
>> Charles Plessy wrote:
>>> - "Another kind of list value has one value per line". Not
>>> straightforward...
[...]
> Shouldn't it be "Another type of list has one value per line"? The
> values don't have one value per line - they only have one line each.
Makes sense. I
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Charles Plessy wrote:
>> - "Another kind of list value has one value per line". Not
>> straightforward...
>
> Doesn't seem so bad. How would you propose rewording it?
Shouldn't it be "Another type of list has one value per line"? The
values don't have one value per l
Hi Charles,
Charles Plessy wrote:
> here is an update of the English proofreading (attached as a patch).
Looks good to me.
[...]
> - "Another kind of list value has one value per line". Not
> straightforward...
Doesn't seem so bad. How would you propose rewording it?
> - "the Copyright f
Le Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:09:05AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
> Le Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 06:47:40PM +0100, gregor herrmann a écrit :
> > On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:24:21 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> >
> > > For what it's worth, I find the text more readable after JBR's changes
> > > than before
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:24:21 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> For what it's worth, I find the text more readable after JBR's changes
> than before.
Same here.
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 11:01:05 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> DEP drivers: do these changes look reasonable to you? Policy
> delegates:
Steve,
it has been monthes that we are waiting for you to say more precisely what is
wrong with the current text. Your comments were promised by Lars for April:
“Steve, my co-driver, says he has a couple of issues he wants to fix before we
are finished with DEP5. He'll write patches and subm
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 07:24:21PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > I think merging such changes (which at a glance appear to include arbitrary
> > preferences of word choice) is a waste of everyone's time and I'm inclined
> > to ignore this altogether in favor of working
Steve Langasek wrote:
> I think merging such changes (which at a glance appear to include arbitrary
> preferences of word choice) is a waste of everyone's time and I'm inclined
> to ignore this altogether in favor of working on the real problems with the
> text.
So, to be clear, does that mean th
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 11:01:05AM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > To consolidate related changes, let's wait however a little
> > for additional propositions. For instance, I would like to suggest to
> > replace
> > “dash” by “hyphen”
> I disagree here. Please file separate reports for separ
tag 648387 + patch
thanks
Le Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 11:01:05AM -0600, Jonathan Nieder a écrit :
>
> Please file separate reports for separate proposals,
> unless the text they affect and subject matter seem to overlap a lot
> and the proposed text is already ready.
No problem. In that case, given
Hi Charles et al,
Charles Plessy wrote:
> thanks a lot Justin for the proofreading.
Thanks for making it happen!
> I read it in details and agree with
> all the changes you propose. I therefore propose to the debian-policy team to
> apply your patch.
I agree --- after a careful look, I didn't
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.9.2
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-l10n-engl...@lists.debian.org
Dear Justin and everybody,
thanks a lot Justin for the proofreading. I read it in details and agree with
all the changes you propose. I therefore propose to the debian-policy team to
appl
13 matches
Mail list logo
