On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 09:44:11PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Roger Leigh]
> > While the bug was originally filed as only wishlist, this does solve
> > a rather more important issue: any change to the defaults would
> > never take effect on upgrade; it would require a fresh install,
> > b
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 20:29:55 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> While the bug was originally filed as only wishlist, this does solve
> a rather more important issue: any change to the defaults would never
> take effect on upgrade; it would require a fresh install, because it's
> only set once on init
[Roger Leigh]
> While the bug was originally filed as only wishlist, this does solve
> a rather more important issue: any change to the defaults would
> never take effect on upgrade; it would require a fresh install,
> because it's only set once on initial install.
Note that this behaviour of not
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:27:07AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 21:19:15 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 06:07:21PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > > > One problem mentioned in a few bugre
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 21:19:15 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 06:07:21PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > > One problem mentioned in a few bugreports is the handling of
> > > updates to /etc/default/rcS. Because it's
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 06:07:21PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > One problem mentioned in a few bugreports is the handling of
> > updates to /etc/default/rcS. Because it's not a conffile, we
> > don't provide updates to it. While there are
6 matches
Mail list logo
