Attached is a debian/ for a new package for 2.14.
Package-wise there aren't many changes:
* Update patches
* Use xaw3d instead of xaw
I've tested the regular package and the extra interfaces package.
A regular user can build this using the followin
Timidity has had a new upstream by now (2.14.0). See
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=201206290019.AA00513%40tamuki.linet.gr.jp&forum_name=timidity-
talk
and
http://timidity.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/timidity/timidity/ChangeLog?revision=1.704&view=markup
for the change
Hi,
On 06/11/2012 02:13 AM, Geoffrey Thomas wrote:
That rounds up the "wrong" (or so I believe) fixes in the Debian pkg.
As said I hope to do a new upstream release soon, amongst a lot of bugfixes
this will also include IPV6 support for the relevant bits of timidity.
Thanks, and thanks for ide
tags 649274 + pending
thanks
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011, Hans de Goede wrote in part:
So about the issues I've found while reviewing all the changes
the Debian pkgs make to the upstream tarbal:
--- timidity-2.13.2.orig/timidity/reverb.c
+++ timidity-2.13.2/timidity/reverb.c
@@ -1624,8 +1630,8 @@ stat
Hello!
The timidity maintainer on sf.net is Urabe Shyouhei (the given name in
the later, I believe). It's trivial to find his other e-mail
addresses. I also found and contacted him on twitter:
https://twitter.com/shyouhei
--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dis
Hi,
On 11/19/2011 09:59 PM, Geoffrey Thomas wrote:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011, Neil Williams wrote:
CC'ing the only person to express some interest. Geoffrey, if you are
no longer interested in timidity, despite signs of interest from a
possible new upstream, please retitle #585039 as O: instead of I
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011, Neil Williams wrote:
CC'ing the only person to express some interest. Geoffrey, if you are
no longer interested in timidity, despite signs of interest from a
possible new upstream, please retitle #585039 as O: instead of ITA:
Thanks for Ccing me. The "real world" had caugh
"If timidity doesn't get IPv6 support soon" ?
I don't see IPv6 as important. It's a major maintenance burden (a hack to firewall, configure,
...), IPSs use it to dominate ISP sales, and so far no one claims to have a final spec on it.
when is IPv4 over IPv6 a sin? are bsd sockets a sin (they
Hi,
On 11/19/2011 04:39 PM, Neil Williams wrote:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 15:05:00 +0100
Hans de Goede wrote:
This is a bit unusual bug-report I'm afraid normally I would've
send this as an email to the Debian package maintainer of
timidity, but it seems that timidity is currently orphaned in
Debi
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 15:05:00 +0100
Hans de Goede wrote:
> This is a bit unusual bug-report I'm afraid normally I would've
> send this as an email to the Debian package maintainer of
> timidity, but it seems that timidity is currently orphaned in
> Debian :|
There has been no interest from anyone
10 matches
Mail list logo
