Hello,
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:57:16PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Tuesday 29 November 2011, Hector Oron wrote:
When compiling apr under armhf architecture, testsuite seem to
hang at testprocmutex test with the followinf backtrace:
I just noticed that there is a special configure
FWIW, maybe it helps, I just did some tests on this, it seems to fail
only on one of the subtests in testprocmutex, APR_LOCK_PROC_PTHREAD
test. Will look into this a bit more.
Regards
Konstantinos
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Wednesday 30 November 2011, Hector Oron wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:57:16PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Tuesday 29 November 2011, Hector Oron wrote:
When compiling apr under armhf architecture, testsuite seem
to
hang at testprocmutex test with the
On Wednesday 30 November 2011, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
FWIW, maybe it helps, I just did some tests on this, it seems to
fail only on one of the subtests in testprocmutex,
APR_LOCK_PROC_PTHREAD test. Will look into this a bit more.
Fixing the actual problem would be very welcome. But I
Hi,
2011/11/29 Hector Oron hector.o...@gmail.com:
Source: apr
Version: 1.4.5-1
Severity: important
This bug is currently blocking armhf archive bootstrap as it should break a
circular dependency cycle.
Please if you have any hint or are willing to reproduce, you could use
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011, Hector Oron wrote:
Disabling tests produces a package, do you think is sane enough to
upload a package to the archive with tests disabled? (its just
testprocmux the one failing).
BTW, I also tried to disable the test, but I get:
.libs/abts.o:abts.c:function alltests:
On Tuesday 29 November 2011, Hector Oron wrote:
Hi,
2011/11/29 Hector Oron hector.o...@gmail.com:
Source: apr
Version: 1.4.5-1
Severity: important
This bug is currently blocking armhf archive bootstrap as it
should break a circular dependency cycle. Please if you have any
hint
On Tuesday 29 November 2011, Hector Oron wrote:
When cmpiling apr under armhf architecture, testsuite seem to
hang at testprocmutex test with the followinf backtrace:
I just noticed that there is a special configure flag concerning
mutexes added for armel. Maybe you need the same for armhf?
Source: apr
Version: 1.4.5-1
Severity: important
Hello,
When cmpiling apr under armhf architecture, testsuite seem to hang
at testprocmutex test with the followinf backtrace:
testprocmutex : |^C
Program received signal SIGINT, Interrupt.
0x400a03e4 in __libc_do_syscall () from
9 matches
Mail list logo
