Bug#650394: [Pkg-tigervnc-devel] Bug#650394: ITP: tigervnc -- High-speed Virtual Network Computing (VNC)

2016-07-05 Thread Dominique Belhachemi
Liang, the package got rejected due to too many lintian warnings. ( http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-tigervnc-devel/Week-of-Mon-20160627/000516.html ) Could you please have a look and re-upload ?

Bug#650394: [Pkg-tigervnc-devel] Bug#650394: ITP: tigervnc -- High-speed Virtual Network Computing (VNC)

2016-06-27 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
It is already in the new queue. So, soon! -- Sent from a phone which beats iPhone.

Bug#650394: [Pkg-tigervnc-devel] Bug#650394: ITP: tigervnc -- High-speed Virtual Network Computing (VNC)

2016-04-14 Thread Dominique Belhachemi
Which OS are you using? Could you please test this with sid again? The command 'git-buildpackage' doesn't exist in sid anymore. Instead you can use 'gbp buildpackage' from the git-buildpackage package. BTW, you may need the additional dependency: libdbus-1-dev -Dominique On Tue, Apr 12, 2016

Bug#650394: [Pkg-tigervnc-devel] Bug#650394: ITP: tigervnc -- High-speed Virtual Network Computing (VNC)

2016-04-12 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi It should be a normal package build. git-buildpackage for example. // Ola On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 9:44 PM, Dominique Belhachemi wrote: > Hi, I would like to test the current tigervnc packages. > > How do I build the packages after 'git clone' ? > git clone

Bug#650394: [Pkg-tigervnc-devel] Bug#650394: ITP: tigervnc -- High-speed Virtual Network Computing (VNC)

2016-03-31 Thread Liang Guo
Hi, The code in git works, I means we can generate all packages and it works correctly as a vnc client and vnc server, but I don't know whether it is well enough to push it to Debian. If nobody oppose, I'll refresh the d/copyright, and upload it within 2 weeks. Thanks, -- Liang Guo

Bug#650394: [Pkg-tigervnc-devel] Bug#650394: ITP: tigervnc -- High-speed Virtual Network Computing (VNC)

2016-03-31 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
On Thu, 31 Mar 2016, James Lu wrote: > I've also found the NeuroDebian packages for Jessie, but that seems to > be of a pretty old version 1.2.0+X1.12.4-1~nd70+1, and isn't installable > at all. myself was swamped with other work all around so had no chance to finish it all up for debian