On 2016-04-01 19:58:20 +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
> 2016-03-22 13:27 Vincent Lefevre:
> > A single removal is bad if it is an application.
>
> That's strange coming from you, who use the resolver costs of minimizing
> removals ;-)
Not really. What I want is:
* no removals =
2016-03-22 13:27 Vincent Lefevre:
Hi Manuel,
On 2016-03-18 15:15:11 +, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
2011-12-08 11:53 Vincent Lefevre:
> The second solution is OK, as only a library package is removed, and
> such a package with no dependencies on it is useless.
Not necessarily.
Hi Manuel,
On 2016-03-18 15:15:11 +, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
> 2011-12-08 11:53 Vincent Lefevre:
> > The second solution is OK, as only a library package is removed, and
> > such a package with no dependencies on it is useless.
>
> Not necessarily. The library might have been
Hi Vincent,
2011-12-08 11:53 Vincent Lefevre:
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.6.4-1.2
Severity: normal
The dependency resolution is suboptimal, even buggy. For instance:
# aptitude install evolution
The following NEW packages will be installed:
libgnome-desktop-3-2{a}
The following packages
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.6.4-1.2
Severity: normal
The dependency resolution is suboptimal, even buggy. For instance:
# aptitude install evolution
The following NEW packages will be installed:
libgnome-desktop-3-2{a}
The following packages will be upgraded:
evolution gnome-desktop3-data
5 matches
Mail list logo
