Bug#654678: readahead-fedora: readahead-collector segfaults

2012-01-06 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2012-01-06 08:04 +0100, Raphael Geissert wrote: On Thursday 05 January 2012 15:36:47 Raphael Geissert wrote: Apparently nobody had run valgrind on the collector for a long time and there are lots of bugs, but those have been there for a long time. Will probably address them by tomorrow and

Bug#654678: readahead-fedora: readahead-collector segfaults

2012-01-06 Thread Raphael Geissert
tag 654678 pending thanks On Friday 06 January 2012 03:51:29 Sven Joachim wrote: How should I proceed to obtain a backtrace? Running readahead-collector manually does not seem to do anything, and the manpage is rather terse. Right, I could extend the manpage a bit. The collector is not really

Bug#654678: readahead-fedora: readahead-collector segfaults

2012-01-05 Thread Raphael Geissert
Hi, On Thursday 05 January 2012 01:07:57 Sven Joachim wrote: I have been seeing these segfaults since the upgrade to 2:1.5.6-2, IIRC. At least, there are several other occurrences of them in /var/log/messages*, while an entry from December 10 (when I still head 2:1.5.6-1 installed) does not

Bug#654678: readahead-fedora: readahead-collector segfaults

2012-01-05 Thread Raphael Geissert
On Thursday 05 January 2012 15:36:47 Raphael Geissert wrote: Apparently nobody had run valgrind on the collector for a long time and there are lots of bugs, but those have been there for a long time. Will probably address them by tomorrow and post a patch, so that if you have no luck with the

Bug#654678: readahead-fedora: readahead-collector segfaults

2012-01-04 Thread Sven Joachim
Package: readahead-fedora Version: 2:1.5.6-3 Severity: normal I noticed these messages in the syslog: , | Jan 5 07:49:09 turtle kernel: [ 27.716211] type=1305 audit(1325746149.941:6): auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 op=remove rule key=(null) list=4 res=1 | Jan 5 07:49:09 turtle kernel: