tags 654793 pending
thanks
-=| Alex Peshkoff, 12.01.2012 19:04:56 +0400 |=-
> I've added support for CPPFLAGS. Moreover, now I use it internally
> for regular posix build
> (http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-3727).
> So I hope you should not have problems with _FORTIFY_SOURCE.
Excellen
On 01/11/12 12:23, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> -=| Alex Peshkoff, 11.01.2012 11:57:55 +0400 |=-
>> On 01/10/12 21:17, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:06:04AM +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> - The check for fortified source functions depends on the use of
> such function
On 01/11/12 12:23, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> -=| Alex Peshkoff, 11.01.2012 11:57:55 +0400 |=-
>> On 01/10/12 21:17, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:06:04AM +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> - The check for fortified source functions depends on the use of
> such function
-=| Alex Peshkoff, 11.01.2012 11:57:55 +0400 |=-
> On 01/10/12 21:17, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:06:04AM +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> >>> - The check for fortified source functions depends on the use of
> >>> such functions. If none of them are present the error "no
On 01/10/12 21:17, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:06:04AM +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
>>> - The check for fortified source functions depends on the use of
>>> such functions. If none of them are present the error "no
>>> protectable libc functions used" is shown. However,
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:06:04AM +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> > - The check for fortified source functions depends on the use of
> > such functions. If none of them are present the error "no
> > protectable libc functions used" is shown. However, there are also
> > results that show "no" (e.g
-=| Moritz Muehlenhoff, 07.01.2012 14:13:56 +0100 |=-
> - relro should on "yes" in all cases. That's the case for the
> binaries I checked, so all seems fine.
Right.
> - The test for a protected stack cannot show that it's activated if
> the tested code doesn't use arrays on the stack. Since th
On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 10:58:31AM +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> -=| Moritz Muehlenhoff, 05.01.2012 21:46:12 +0100 |=-
> > I'm currently checking all packages, which had a DSA in the last
> > year to enable hardened build flags. firebird2.5 has already been
> > updated to use dpkg-buildflags, but I
-=| Moritz Muehlenhoff, 05.01.2012 21:46:12 +0100 |=-
> I'm currently checking all packages, which had a DSA in the last
> year to enable hardened build flags. firebird2.5 has already been
> updated to use dpkg-buildflags, but I noticed that not all flags
> are fully in effect. You can use the hard
9 matches
Mail list logo
