Bug#654845: closed by Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org (Re: Bug#654845: libarpack2: ARPACK should link against LAPACK 2.0, and not liblapack)

2012-01-12 Thread Viral Shah
#654845: libarpack2: ARPACK should link against LAPACK 2.0, and not liblapack Date: January 11, 2012 9:15:22 PM GMT+05:30 To: roucaries bastien roucaries.bastien+deb...@gmail.com Cc: 654845-d...@bugs.debian.org, Viral B. Shah vi...@mayin.org, 654...@bugs.debian.org, cont...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#654845: closed by Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org (Re: Bug#654845: libarpack2: ARPACK should link against LAPACK 2.0, and not liblapack)

2012-01-12 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
: ARPACK should link against LAPACK 2.0, and not liblapack Date: January 11, 2012 9:15:22 PM GMT+05:30 To: roucaries bastien roucaries.bastien+deb...@gmail.com Cc: 654845-d...@bugs.debian.org, Viral B. Shah vi...@mayin.org, 654...@bugs.debian.org, cont...@bugs.debian.org forcemerge

Bug#654845: libarpack2: ARPACK should link against LAPACK 2.0, and not liblapack

2012-01-11 Thread roucaries bastien
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org wrote: Le vendredi 06 janvier 2012 à 01:51 -0500, Viral B. Shah a écrit : Package: libarpack2 Severity: important ARPACK needs to use LAPACK 2.0 for correctness. This will cause a conflict with liblapack upon which it

Bug#654845: libarpack2: ARPACK should link against LAPACK 2.0, and not liblapack

2012-01-11 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
forcemerge 654845 315570 thanks Le mercredi 11 janvier 2012 à 15:53 +0100, roucaries bastien a écrit : On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org wrote: Le vendredi 06 janvier 2012 à 01:51 -0500, Viral B. Shah a écrit : Package: libarpack2 Severity: important

Bug#654845: libarpack2: ARPACK should link against LAPACK 2.0, and not liblapack

2012-01-10 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Le vendredi 06 janvier 2012 à 01:51 -0500, Viral B. Shah a écrit : Package: libarpack2 Severity: important ARPACK needs to use LAPACK 2.0 for correctness. This will cause a conflict with liblapack upon which it depends. See this thread on the issue and a name mangling fix, so that LAPACK

Bug#654845: libarpack2: ARPACK should link against LAPACK 2.0, and not liblapack

2012-01-05 Thread Viral B. Shah
Package: libarpack2 Severity: important ARPACK needs to use LAPACK 2.0 for correctness. This will cause a conflict with liblapack upon which it depends. See this thread on the issue and a name mangling fix, so that LAPACK 2.0 routines can be used in ARPACK. The BLAS can be the standard one from