#654845: libarpack2: ARPACK should link against LAPACK 2.0,
and not liblapack
Date: January 11, 2012 9:15:22 PM GMT+05:30
To: roucaries bastien roucaries.bastien+deb...@gmail.com
Cc: 654845-d...@bugs.debian.org, Viral B. Shah vi...@mayin.org,
654...@bugs.debian.org, cont...@bugs.debian.org
: ARPACK should link against LAPACK 2.0,
and not liblapack
Date: January 11, 2012 9:15:22 PM GMT+05:30
To: roucaries bastien roucaries.bastien+deb...@gmail.com
Cc: 654845-d...@bugs.debian.org, Viral B. Shah vi...@mayin.org,
654...@bugs.debian.org, cont...@bugs.debian.org
forcemerge
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org wrote:
Le vendredi 06 janvier 2012 à 01:51 -0500, Viral B. Shah a écrit :
Package: libarpack2
Severity: important
ARPACK needs to use LAPACK 2.0 for correctness. This will cause a
conflict with liblapack upon which it
forcemerge 654845 315570
thanks
Le mercredi 11 janvier 2012 à 15:53 +0100, roucaries bastien a écrit :
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org
wrote:
Le vendredi 06 janvier 2012 à 01:51 -0500, Viral B. Shah a écrit :
Package: libarpack2
Severity: important
Le vendredi 06 janvier 2012 à 01:51 -0500, Viral B. Shah a écrit :
Package: libarpack2
Severity: important
ARPACK needs to use LAPACK 2.0 for correctness. This will cause a
conflict with liblapack upon which it depends. See this thread on the
issue and a name mangling fix, so that LAPACK
Package: libarpack2
Severity: important
ARPACK needs to use LAPACK 2.0 for correctness. This will cause a
conflict with liblapack upon which it depends. See this thread on the
issue and a name mangling fix, so that LAPACK 2.0 routines can be used
in ARPACK. The BLAS can be the standard one from
6 matches
Mail list logo