Bug#655388: [Python-modules-team] Bug#655388: python-numpy: FTBFS: [m68k] unrecognised long double format

2012-01-11 Thread Sandro Tosi
forwarded 655388 http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/2014 thanks On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 22:28, Thorsten Glaser t...@mirbsd.de wrote: Sandro Tosi dixit: there a chance you can test numpy from experimental (v.1.6.1)? This way I can provide additional information to developers. ValueError:

Bug#655388: [Python-modules-team] Bug#655388: python-numpy: FTBFS: [m68k] unrecognised long double format

2012-01-10 Thread Sandro Tosi
Hi Thorsten, thanks for your report. On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 21:02, Thorsten Glaser t...@mirbsd.de wrote: Source: python-numpy Version: 1.5.1-3 Tags: upstream Hi, the m68k “long double” format isn’t recognised: I'll forward this upstream, but first I'd like to ask you a favour: is there a

Bug#655388: [Python-modules-team] Bug#655388: python-numpy: FTBFS: [m68k] unrecognised long double format

2012-01-10 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Sandro Tosi dixit: I'll forward this upstream, but first I'd like to ask you a favour: is there a chance you can test numpy from experimental (v.1.6.1)? This way I can provide additional information to developers. I can try that, sure. Also, in case they provide a patch, is there already a

Bug#655388: [Python-modules-team] Bug#655388: python-numpy: FTBFS: [m68k] unrecognised long double format

2012-01-10 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Sandro Tosi dixit: there a chance you can test numpy from experimental (v.1.6.1)? This way I can provide additional information to developers. ValueError: Unrecognized format (['000', '000', '000', '000', '001', '043', '105', '147', '211', '253', '315', '357', '300', '031', '000', '000', '353',