On Mi, Jan 25, 2012 at 13:15:31 (CET), Harald Dunkel wrote:
> On 01/23/12 07:22, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>>
>> I don't think this would be a great idea. As application maintainer,
>> you should know the requirements of your package, and knowing the
>> libraries it uses is one part of them.
>>
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/23/12 07:22, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>
> I don't think this would be a great idea. As application maintainer, you
> should know the requirements of your package, and knowing the libraries it
> uses is one part of them.
>
Not necessarily. If
Am 23.01.2012 07:22, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
I don't think this would be a great idea. As application maintainer,
you should know the requirements of your package, and knowing the
libraries it uses is one part of them.
Having already considered that idea some years ago, this is exactly
what
tag 656848 wontfix
stop
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Package: libav
> Version: 4:0.8~beta2-3
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Would you mind to provide a meta package libav-dev requesting
> all the other libav development pa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: libav
Version: 4:0.8~beta2-3
Severity: wishlist
Would you mind to provide a meta package libav-dev requesting
all the other libav development packages in the same version?
This could make writing package build dependencies much easier.
Many
5 matches
Mail list logo