On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
- binNMU insighttoolkit
I've now scheduled that and will look at scheduling the other packages
(see http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gdcm.html) once
insighttoolkit's done.
excellent !
igstk is not
On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 11:13 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
GDCM 2.2.0 introduces a new ABI, as seen on #655783 and al.
Since API (whatever that means for C++) is preserved, would it be a good time
to
- move gdcm 2.2.0 from experimental to unstable
We've covered that one already. :-)
-
On 02.02.2012 20:55, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 11:13 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
GDCM 2.2.0 introduces a new ABI, as seen on #655783 and al.
Since API (whatever that means for C++) is
tags 657288 + pending
thanks
On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 11:13 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
GDCM 2.2.0 introduces a new ABI, as seen on #655783 and al.
Since API (whatever that means for C++) is preserved, would it be a good time
to
- move gdcm 2.2.0 from experimental to unstable
Apparently
Hi Adam,
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 11:13 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
GDCM 2.2.0 introduces a new ABI, as seen on #655783 and al.
Since API (whatever that means for C++) is preserved, would it be a good
time to
-
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
GDCM 2.2.0 introduces a new ABI, as seen on #655783 and al.
Since API (whatever that means for C++) is preserved, would it be a good time to
- move gdcm 2.2.0 from experimental to
6 matches
Mail list logo
