Bug#657646: Update alternative priority for surf is too high

2012-01-31 Thread Vasudev Kamath
Forwarding reply from Zachary - Forwarded message from Zachary Vance vanc...@gmail.com - Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 16:18:07 -0500 From: Zachary Vance vanc...@gmail.com To: Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Update alternative priority for surf is too high On 28 January 2012

Bug#657646: Update alternative priority for surf is too high

2012-01-27 Thread Vasudev Kamath
Package: surf Severity: normal Forwarding a mail which was sent to me by previous maintainer On 15 January 2012 19:58, Zachary Vance vanc...@gmail.com wrote: Hey, I eventually tracked down a problem I had to this package. I ended up being surprised by update-alternatives priority being higher

Bug#657646: Update alternative priority for surf is too high

2012-01-27 Thread Jakub Wilk
On 15 January 2012 19:58, Zachary Vance vanc...@gmail.com wrote: Hey, I eventually tracked down a problem I had to this package. I ended up being surprised by update-alternatives priority being higher than other browsers' since surf didn't obviously seem like a standalone browser (and for

Bug#657646: Update alternative priority for surf is too high

2012-01-27 Thread Vasudev Kamath
I grepped through the lintian laboratory looking for all browser registering x-www-browser alternative. Here are the results: netsurf 100 konqueror 100 epiphany-browser85 iceape 80 iceweasel 70 links2 69 surf50 midori