Bug#657657: and unstable?

2012-01-29 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 09:23:45PM +, Nicholas Bamber wrote: I think it would be enwise to expect experimental to make it into wheezy. I might backport some features like splitting the docs package. The issue is that there is a fairly big backwards compatibility issue. Patch for sid is

Bug#657657: and unstable?

2012-01-27 Thread Nicholas Bamber
Moritz, Thanks for the bug report. I had a feeling this was coming down the line. I'll certainly put it in experimental but I think it rather more important to go on unstable as well. Is there something I'm missing here. -- Nicholas Bamber | http://www.periapt.co.uk/ PGP key 3BFFE73C

Bug#657657: and unstable?

2012-01-27 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 08:44:30PM +, Nicholas Bamber wrote: Moritz, Thanks for the bug report. I had a feeling this was coming down the line. I'll certainly put it in experimental but I think it rather more important to go on unstable as well. Is there something I'm missing here. I

Bug#657657: and unstable?

2012-01-27 Thread Nicholas Bamber
I think it would be enwise to expect experimental to make it into wheezy. I might backport some features like splitting the docs package. The issue is that there is a fairly big backwards compatibility issue. On 27/01/12 20:52, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 08:44:30PM +,