Bug#658341: Call for Vote: upload of multi-arch enabled dpkg (in time for wheezy)

2012-02-05 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 08:16:34AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote: > On Thu, 2 Feb 2012 10:08:13 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli > wrote: > > I hereby submit to your attention the "dpkg multi-arch conflict". > > I believe the issue is well-known, so I describe it only briefly > > below; > I also believe we

Bug#658341: Call for Vote: upload of multi-arch enabled dpkg (in time for wheezy)

2012-02-05 Thread Andreas Barth
* Bdale Garbee (bd...@gag.com) [120202 15:16]: > A. While recognizing the substantial benefits of thorough code review, the >Technical Committee believes the goal of multiarch support in the >Debian wheezy release is sufficiently important as to warrant accepting >the current draft impl

Bug#658341: Call for Vote: upload of multi-arch enabled dpkg (in time for wheezy)

2012-02-05 Thread Andreas Barth
* Andreas Barth (a...@ayous.org) [120205 10:34]: > * Bdale Garbee (bd...@gag.com) [120202 15:16]: > > A. While recognizing the substantial benefits of thorough code review, the > >Technical Committee believes the goal of multiarch support in the > >Debian wheezy release is sufficiently impo

Bug#658341: Call for Vote: upload of multi-arch enabled dpkg (in time for wheezy)

2012-02-03 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 08:16:34AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote: > I also believe we've had sufficient discussion about this issue, and I > therefore call for an immediate vote on the following ballot. My thanks > to Russ Allbery for help drafting the text. I vote A C B. -- Colin Watson

Bug#658341: Call for Vote: upload of multi-arch enabled dpkg (in time for wheezy)

2012-02-02 Thread Russ Allbery
Bdale Garbee writes: > I also believe we've had sufficient discussion about this issue, and I > therefore call for an immediate vote on the following ballot. My thanks > to Russ Allbery for help drafting the text. I vote A, C, B. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)

Bug#658341: Call for Vote: upload of multi-arch enabled dpkg (in time for wheezy)

2012-02-02 Thread Don Armstrong
On Thu, 02 Feb 2012, Bdale Garbee wrote: > A. While recognizing the substantial benefits of thorough code review, the [...] >This option requires a 3:1 majority. > > B. The Technical Committee declines to override the decision of the dpkg >maintainer to hold the dpkg multiarch implement

Bug#658341: Call for Vote: upload of multi-arch enabled dpkg (in time for wheezy)

2012-02-02 Thread Ian Jackson
Bdale Garbee writes ("Bug#658341: Call for Vote: upload of multi-arch enabled dpkg (in time for wheezy)"): > A. [...] >February 6th: upload to experimental for general testing >February 20th: upload to unstable ... > B. The Technical Committee declines to override th

Bug#658341: Call for Vote: upload of multi-arch enabled dpkg (in time for wheezy)

2012-02-02 Thread Bdale Garbee
On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 08:16:34 -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote: > I also believe we've had sufficient discussion about this issue, and I > therefore call for an immediate vote on the following ballot. And my vote is ACB. Bdale pgpm5nnI2RadG.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#658341: Call for Vote: upload of multi-arch enabled dpkg (in time for wheezy)

2012-02-02 Thread Bdale Garbee
On Thu, 2 Feb 2012 10:08:13 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > I hereby submit to your attention the "dpkg multi-arch conflict". > I believe the issue is well-known, so I describe it only briefly > below; I also believe we've had sufficient discussion about this issue, and I therefore call for an