Bug#659733: Bug#659720: Bug#659733: libreoffice: -writer and -calc cannot open/save files with passwords

2012-02-29 Thread Noël Köthe
Am Montag, den 27.02.2012, 13:08 +0100 schrieb Rene Engelhard: > Apparently the thunderb^Wicedove profile also gets used and > upstream received a bugreport wrt that, too: ... > icedove | 3.1.16-1 | wheezy| source, amd64, armel, > i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, m

Bug#659733: Bug#659720: Bug#659733: libreoffice: -writer and -calc cannot open/save files with passwords

2012-02-27 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 07:21:36PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 06:26:38PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > idea is that it might have something to do with fire^Wiceweasel version? > > > > iceweasel | 9.0.1-1 | wheezy | source, amd64, armel, > >

Bug#659720: Bug#659733: Bug#659720: Bug#659733: libreoffice: -writer and -calc cannot open/save files with passwords

2012-02-21 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 06:26:38PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > And we should have a unittest for this now > (http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=8f82bccf26d14d3ad4a64739edd9ba23c124b8ad) > Which I am going to backport... And that new unittest (which incidentially seems

Bug#659733: Bug#659720: Bug#659733: libreoffice: -writer and -calc cannot open/save files with passwords

2012-02-21 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 06:26:38PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > idea is that it might have something to do with fire^Wiceweasel version? > > iceweasel | 9.0.1-1 | wheezy | source, amd64, armel, > armhf, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, > s3

Bug#659733: Bug#659720: Bug#659733: libreoffice: -writer and -calc cannot open/save files with passwords

2012-02-21 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 09:49:37AM +0100, Noël Köthe wrote: > Am Montag, den 20.02.2012, 22:16 +0100 schrieb Rene Engelhard: > > > > > I cannot open and save password protected libreoffice files anymore. > > > > > > > > Can you reproduce this? > > > > No. Upstream wanted a testfile (with 2